KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 16 of 51 1 2 14 15 16 17 18 50 51
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
H
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
And you still haven’t answered my question. Should we buy a player who we know has a dodgy knee?
Originally Posted By TiredReds
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Sounds like we were rushing it through to sign him before he left for the WC, most of us were happy we were tying the deal up quickly, so we can't really blame FSG for trying to do something we were all lauding them for, like we did for the Fabinho deal.


Hercules will always find a way to blame FSG because they don't have the Sheiks money to throw away.

I've not mentioned FSG in any of my posts on this issue, yet some would like to put words in my mouth it seems. For the record I don't think FSG top brass had any involvement in this hamfisted cock up, as they'd have left that to staff further down the chain, having presumably ok'd the expenditure.

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,746
A
Under 23 Player
Offline
Under 23 Player
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,746
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Originally Posted By Hercules/AF 58
Fekir's knee injury was well known before we went in for him, plus subsequent additional injuries, so it seems a bit ham fisted to be arguing about fitness injuries now, after the announcement video was shot and a jersey number allocated!!also there was a difference of medical opinion on the seriousness of the injury, all very strange.


When you pay £50+ million for a player, the medical people will be looking at his fitness over the length of his contract, which could be 5 years, so they might say he's fine now, but there could be degenerative damage to the knee that in the next few years could cause problems/weaken the knee, that level of detail would only come out in a full medical with X-rays etc, sometime you take a risk, like Man Utd did with Van Nistelrooy, which worked out well for them.

This affects getting medical insurance etc, so it's important for the club/business, as he's a 50 million asset.



And if it goes tits up you can't sell a sicknote on £150k plus a week for all that much.

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
E
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
Originally Posted By SSO
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Originally Posted By Hercules/AF 58
Fekir's knee injury was well known before we went in for him, plus subsequent additional injuries, so it seems a bit ham fisted to be arguing about fitness injuries now, after the announcement video was shot and a jersey number allocated!!also there was a difference of medical opinion on the seriousness of the injury, all very strange.


When you pay £50+ million for a player, the medical people will be looking at his fitness over the length of his contract, which could be 5 years, so they might say he's fine now, but there could be degenerative damage to the knee that in the next few years could cause problems/weaken the knee, that level of detail would only come out in a full medical with X-rays etc, sometime you take a risk, like Man Utd did with Van Nistelrooy, which worked out well for them.

This affects getting medical insurance etc, so it's important for the club/business, as he's a 50 million asset.



And if it goes tits up you can't sell a sicknote on £150k plus a week for all that much.


It's not just you can't sell them for that much, it's that they are sat on the books earning £150K a week for a few years while they run down their contract (which they are entitled to do).

Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 28
Trialist
Offline
Trialist
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 28
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Due diligence is doing a medical. Pretty simple really.


But arnt we still in for him but at lesser fee ? If your knee is crocked it’s crocked at any price isn’t it ?

Last edited by Reds_Rock; 21/06/18 10:37 PM.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Offline
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By Reds_Rock
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Due diligence is doing a medical. Pretty simple really.


But arnt we still in for him but at lesser fee ? If your knee is crocked it’s crocked at any price isn’t it ?


Agree. However, if you put injury related discounts or games played related fees instead of paying the whole fee upfront without conditions, it would make sense, no?

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Offline
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Originally Posted By Hercules/AF 58
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
And you still haven’t answered my question. Should we buy a player who we know has a dodgy knee?
Originally Posted By TiredReds
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Sounds like we were rushing it through to sign him before he left for the WC, most of us were happy we were tying the deal up quickly, so we can't really blame FSG for trying to do something we were all lauding them for, like we did for the Fabinho deal.


Hercules will always find a way to blame FSG because they don't have the Sheiks money to throw away.

I've not mentioned FSG in any of my posts on this issue, yet some would like to put words in my mouth it seems. For the record I don't think FSG top brass had any involvement in this hamfisted cock up, as they'd have left that to staff further down the chain, having presumably ok'd the expenditure.


Haha. It’s always s about FSG with you. And still no answer to my very simple question. Not even a poem? Speaks volumes to your answer and whole take on this.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Offline
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Originally Posted By TiredReds
Originally Posted By Reds_Rock
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Due diligence is doing a medical. Pretty simple really.


But arnt we still in for him but at lesser fee ? If your knee is crocked it’s crocked at any price isn’t it ?


Agree. However, if you put injury related discounts or games played related fees instead of paying the whole fee upfront without conditions, it would make sense, no?


What vish said. And if Lyon were super confident of his fitness and condition they shouldn’t have an issue with a bonus related payment.

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Under 23 Player
Offline
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Originally Posted By TiredReds
Originally Posted By Reds_Rock
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Due diligence is doing a medical. Pretty simple really.


But arnt we still in for him but at lesser fee ? If your knee is crocked it’s crocked at any price isn’t it ?


Agree. However, if you put injury related discounts or games played related fees instead of paying the whole fee upfront without conditions, it would make sense, no?


What vish said. And if Lyon were super confident of his fitness and condition they shouldn’t have an issue with a bonus related payment.


Of course they'll have an issue with it, as would every other club in the world (including Liverpool). They're operating on a budget and will be holding out to get as much money guaranteed up front as they possibly can.

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
E
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
Originally Posted By KingoftheKop
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
[quote=TiredReds][quote=Reds_Rock][quote=wilkij1975]Due diligence is doing a medical. Pretty simple really.



Of course they'll have an issue with it, as would every other club in the world (including Liverpool). They're operating on a budget and will be holding out to get as much money guaranteed up front as they possibly can.


Didn't the Coutinho to Barca deal have about £40 million worth of bonuses built into it, based on appearances and achievements? as far as I know Coutinho has never had a major injury, unlike Fekir, so it seems fair to pay something like £30 million upfront and £20 million in appearances,

Modern transfers are staggered over a few years now anyways, rarely are they paid upfront with the full amount, so you'd think £10 million after 50 appearances and £10 million after 100 appearances would be fair.

Now Liverpool have queried the medical, any club going into a transfer for him will raise this and want to negotiate a similar deal I bet.




Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Offline
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Originally Posted By TiredReds
Originally Posted By Reds_Rock
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Due diligence is doing a medical. Pretty simple really.


But arnt we still in for him but at lesser fee ? If your knee is crocked it’s crocked at any price isn’t it ?


Agree. However, if you put injury related discounts or games played related fees instead of paying the whole fee upfront without conditions, it would make sense, no?


What vish said. And if Lyon were super confident of his fitness and condition they shouldn’t have an issue with a bonus related payment.


What they did miss though is that Aulas didn't want to sell at least before the wc. He was being forced by Fekir who probably had a deal with him. He jumped on the opportunity of not selling. He doesn't really need to sell since Lyon qualified for CL.

Page 16 of 51 1 2 14 15 16 17 18 50 51

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion