|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
No his lame and will get lamer Don't think so, he is not much more vulnerable than other players and Can has been injured as well last season.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
Hendo
Ill Aug 3, 2017 Aug 7, 2017 4 days -
16/17 Foot injury Feb 26, 2017 Jul 5, 2017 129 days 13Liverpool FC
15/16 Torn ligament in the knee Apr 7, 2016 May 12, 2016 35 days 11Liverpool FC
15/16 Minor wound Dec 31, 2015 Jan 11, 2016 11 days 3Liverpool FC
15/16 Metatarsal fracture Sep 17, 2015 Nov 26, 2015 70 days 15Liverpool FC
15/16 Heel Bone Injury Aug 17, 2015 Sep 17, 2015 31 days 5Liverpool FC
14/15 Malleolar injury Feb 23, 2015 Feb 26, 2015 3 days 1Liverpool FC
09/10 Malleolar injury Feb 8, 2010 Apr 5, 2010 56 days 9Sunderland AFC
Can
INJURY HISTORY
Injury history To the correction form
Season
injury
from
until
Days
Games missed
16/17 Ankle problems Jun 24, 2017 Jun 24, 2017 0 days -
16/17 Knee injury Dec 9, 2016 Dec 19, 2016 10 days 3Liverpool FC
16/17 Tear in a joint capsule Aug 22, 2016 Sep 20, 2016 29 days 5Liverpool FC
15/16 Torn Ankle Joint Ligament Apr 14, 2016 May 2, 2016 18 days 6Liverpool FC
14/15 Malleolar injury Sep 8, 2014 Oct 16, 2014 38 days 7Liverpool FC
12/13 Torn Ankle Joint Ligament Nov 5, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 56 days 11Bayern Munich
11/12 Torn muscle Mar 15, 2012 Apr 5, 2012 21 days 4FC Bayern Munich II
Hendo 340 + days injured
Can 160 That's an average of 48 days per season for Henderson compared to 32 days for Can. Henderson is the first on the team sheet while Can has often been on the bench even when fit, thus playing less and therefore with a lower risk of being injured. So for me the difference is not that big and I am sure right now Henderson is considered more important than Can
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,088
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,088 |
Can is better suited to the position currently held by Henderson and Hendo is the popular first choice.
This would be a deciding factor in whether he stays or goes.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
Hendo
Ill Aug 3, 2017 Aug 7, 2017 4 days -
16/17 Foot injury Feb 26, 2017 Jul 5, 2017 129 days 13Liverpool FC
15/16 Torn ligament in the knee Apr 7, 2016 May 12, 2016 35 days 11Liverpool FC
15/16 Minor wound Dec 31, 2015 Jan 11, 2016 11 days 3Liverpool FC
15/16 Metatarsal fracture Sep 17, 2015 Nov 26, 2015 70 days 15Liverpool FC
15/16 Heel Bone Injury Aug 17, 2015 Sep 17, 2015 31 days 5Liverpool FC
14/15 Malleolar injury Feb 23, 2015 Feb 26, 2015 3 days 1Liverpool FC
09/10 Malleolar injury Feb 8, 2010 Apr 5, 2010 56 days 9Sunderland AFC
Can
INJURY HISTORY
Injury history To the correction form
Season
injury
from
until
Days
Games missed
16/17 Ankle problems Jun 24, 2017 Jun 24, 2017 0 days -
16/17 Knee injury Dec 9, 2016 Dec 19, 2016 10 days 3Liverpool FC
16/17 Tear in a joint capsule Aug 22, 2016 Sep 20, 2016 29 days 5Liverpool FC
15/16 Torn Ankle Joint Ligament Apr 14, 2016 May 2, 2016 18 days 6Liverpool FC
14/15 Malleolar injury Sep 8, 2014 Oct 16, 2014 38 days 7Liverpool FC
12/13 Torn Ankle Joint Ligament Nov 5, 2012 Dec 31, 2012 56 days 11Bayern Munich
11/12 Torn muscle Mar 15, 2012 Apr 5, 2012 21 days 4FC Bayern Munich II
Hendo 340 + days injured
Can 160 That's an average of 48 days per season for Henderson compared to 32 days for Can. Henderson is the first on the team sheet while Can has often been on the bench even when fit, thus playing less and therefore with a lower risk of being injured. So for me the difference is not that big and I am sure right now Henderson is considered more important than Can That don't sound rite vish ? 48 to 32 ? 160 goes into 340 more than twice which means Can is less injury prone by over 100% on their careers yet you have an average discrepancy of only 16 days by those stats ? True ? There are 2 seasons more for Henderson in your stats and I just did an average
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
Yeah but Can is as it stands now 100% less injury prone true ? I don't know what that means, how did you calculate that %, please elaborate
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
This is there figs to date
160 plus 100% = 320 Hendo is 340 so that's 180 more than can which is over a 100% more than can Buy you need to take an average per season as Henderson has played longer and it is normal that he had been injured more. The more you play the bigger the risk of being injured
Last edited by TiredReds; 10/09/17 05:32 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
