KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#576956 31/08/17 08:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 431
B
Under 16 Player
OP Offline
Under 16 Player
B
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 431
Do we all agree that this was just a pr stunt from fsg.......

blind_faith #576957 31/08/17 08:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Under 23 Player
Offline
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
No

blind_faith #576959 31/08/17 08:40 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,077
M
Under 23 Player
Offline
Under 23 Player
M
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,077
Monaco asked arsenal for £52mil (€60m) but then sold their entire squad and made 17billion.

I think we were interested. Hence the £55mil bid. He would have been a coutinho replacement. If we had bid £65mil at the start of the window he would be playing for us. But at the same time. He wouldn't have come until we had CL football.

After selling everyone they could ask for whatever fee they wanted. As they don't want or need to sell him.

They then said £92mil (€100m) thinking no one would pay it. Arsenal bid. It was accepted. But he rejected it saying he'd prefer a move to Liverpool or a CL club.

No PR stunt. Just one of a hundred failed transfers. I'd say it was a stunt if we bid for Messi. But Lemar was attainable.

blind_faith #576971 31/08/17 09:37 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,077
M
Under 23 Player
Offline
Under 23 Player
M
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,077
90mil for a player that cost 4mil last year is a lot of money.

He's a really good player but that's a ridiculous amount. Especially after they asked for £52m at the start of the window.

#576972 31/08/17 09:43 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,060
WNP Offline
Under 23 Player
Offline
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,060
Originally Posted By TheKopProphet
Why didn't we match for 90 mil? We have 24 hours to fleece Barca for 140-160 mil for Phil. We were going to pay 90 + mil for Keita - then got him for 48 next year. We saved 50 mil that could have been put into Lemar. I don't get Liverpool's thinking. They want shot of Coutinho (really) and had the perfect opportunity to please all parties. But the biggest failure is not getting a single CB in three months.


I think he highest we bid for Keita was 66m, so not sure where you've got that we were willing to spend over 90m? He's also cost us more than 48m as we had to pay a premium to get the deal done, so that saving of 50m you've come up with is a massive overstatement (by about 35-40m).

I agree though that had we got Lemar and sold Coutinho it would have worked for everyone, but is Lemar worth anywhere near 90m? I'd never even heard of him before this (that could just be my lack of familiarity with the French league)

IMO if we were going to bid 90m for anyone it should have been for Van Dyke as that would have strengthened our team the most

#576973 31/08/17 09:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Offline
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By TheKopProphet
Why didn't we match for 90 mil? We have 24 hours to fleece Barca for 140-160 mil for Phil. We were going to pay 90 + mil for Keita - then got him for 48 next year. We saved 50 mil that could have been put into Lemar. I don't get Liverpool's thinking. They want shot of Coutinho (really) and had the perfect opportunity to please all parties. But the biggest failure is not getting a single CB in three months.


Is it not better to keep Coutinho? Must say I am not sure as the latter really wants to move. Not getting a CB is a mess.


Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion