KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 11 of 19 1 2 … 9 10 11 12 13 … 18 19
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Originally Posted By sixtiesred
It's the illegally meets a player bit that makes me believe he was given the nod by a suit so he thought it was approved to meet I don't believe he would of met him other wise imo


I'm not so sure, only Klopp can answer that, these days it appears its quite common that the buying club agree the deal with the player before agreeing the fee with selling club, this puts the pressure on the selling club as they know the player wants to move if they have agreed a deal, usually on increase wage/package etc.

Part of the issue with Vvd was probably that we are the third in line for him behind Man City & Chelsea from a financial point of view, but we have Klopp who can convince him of the LFC future/plans and guarantee him first team football, where at a City or Chelsea he is more of a squad player, look how Aguero/Harte have been treated.

So it was probably key to our strategy to speak to him and convince him of LFC plans, then we agree the fee with Southampton after we know he will join and Southampton know that, which is pretty much what happened. The problem we made was that someone leaked it that he had agreed to join us and rejected Chelsea & Man City, which meant Southampton wouldn't get the bidding war they hoped for, so they wanted to kill the deal, so they threatened to use the evidence they probably had for weeks on our behaviour.

I bet if we had bid £50million and Chelsea/City had bid £60 million, then we countered with £70million, I bet we would have got permission to speak with VvD then with no threats of reporting us. I expect we will make a big of around £65million in a few weeks and get him, after selling Sakho for £30million.




I hope we don't bid more than 50m for a defender, especially he is not considered best in the world as much as I know

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Originally Posted By sixtiesred
I still don't believe Klopp knew he was contacting the player illegally
He is a very experienced manager would know the tap up rules especially after the u18 fiasco too I'm sticking with someone in a suit telling him its all been approved to make contact
As I don't really think Klopp would do it without that nod !

However I could see fsg wanting to feck things up on a 50 mil player deal that they weren't going to change Klopps mind on , that's my opinion no conspiracy just trust Klopp to do the right thing especially as he wouldn't want this to happen as it would stop him getting his top target and if we do it will be late in the piece which again Klopp didn't want ?


If that's the case and someone at the club misled him which led to him losing his primary target, I expect we would have seen his resignation by now. Otherwise he's not the manager I thought he was. The notion that he thought it was legal is a little far fetched.

But all managers will do what he did anyway. It goes on for sure so even though he did something wrong strictly speaking, it's no worse for me than what any other manager would do. Same with the stories that came out too. It happens all the time.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
So you're basically saying that you think Klopp is stupid as he was duped into thinking he had permission to speak to him?

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
C
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
C Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
So you're basically saying that you think Klopp is stupid as he was duped into thinking he had permission to speak to him?


If people at the club at deliberately misleading the manager as is being suggested then we have massive problems, much bigger than FSG's transfer approach.

Personally I cannot believe this at all.

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,460
Muj Offline
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,460
Originally Posted By sixtiesred
The question is do you believe Klopp would break tap up rules or not ?

I don't think he would the fact that he contacted him suggests someone in a suit has said it's been approved I rate Klopp higher that a tap up artist


thats my view on this too


Steven Gerrard: Heartbeat of LFC.


football is fuckingg cruel
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
L
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
L Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By Hercules/AF 58
Agreed LFCDU, but for some reason it seems to suit a couple of posters here to always try and lessen the blame on FSG when they fu*k up.


Yep that's true, especially when they pick and choose information to forget that is crucial , like how on earth is Klopp to blame when the only reason we are in for VvD is because of Klopp ???

I'm puzzled how they never address this blatant peice of information in blaming issue.

I think these are the same people who haven't read FSG's court statement upon buying the club, kindve a depressing statement but basically sums up FSG's motives exactly.


How about you choosing to not mention the fact that Klopp illegally met a player? As I've said many times and am getting bored of doing so (you obviously choosing to ignore this info.), I don't blame Klopp but has to take his share of it for his part in it.


No he doesn't deserve to take his share, his share is credit for convincing the player, his share is accredited , FSG feked it up ultimately , I've mentioned Klopp multiple times it's illegal , ye but I don't care because he would've not had the opportunity to convince him if not, he had to do it, I'm not sure about conspiracy of FSG purposely misleading him , but ultimately if all clubs do it and what Klopp did is normal , than that leaves the outlier in LFC's management which stinks of this type of transfer mishaps for a far longer time to properly make a more accurate assumption that FSG's transfer strategy that has been passed down to the suits are not good enough , so blame isn't on Klopp, just credit for convincing the player illegal or otherwise, everyone was shocked with the statement because it was completely unnecessary and stunk of naive non-footballing FSG stunt.

This blame is on FSG, if you want to get all philosophical then yes technically it's the whole clubs mistake but it's really FSG's fault for their strategy they do time and time again regardless of club or target significance

Last edited by LFCDownUnder; 22/06/17 05:51 PM. Reason: Spelling error

It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
L
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
L Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Originally Posted By Chris2402
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By Hercules/AF 58
Agreed LFCDU, but for some reason it seems to suit a couple of posters here to always try and lessen the blame on FSG when they fu*k up.


Yep that's true, especially when they pick and choose information to forget that is crucial , like how on earth is Klopp to blame when the only reason we are in for VvD is because of Klopp ???

I'm puzzled how they never address this blatant peice of information in blaming issue.

I think these are the same people who haven't read FSG's court statement upon buying the club, kindve a depressing statement but basically sums up FSG's motives exactly.


So you know for a fact that we are only in for Van Dijk because of Klopp?

I don't pick and choose and information for the record, I'm one of the few people on here who try and have a balanced view. If that means not lambasting the owners at every possible moment then so be it.

As a new poster to this website I'm struggling to understand how you can state me and Wilks, (it's obvious who you are aiming at) haven't read FSG's statement upon buying the club. You have absolutely no idea what my opinion is on the owners.

Try reading what people post, I have stated many times that Klopp is partly to blame in the whole Van Dijk saga, IN MY OPINION! I have never said he is solely to blame, nor have I said FSG aren't to blame, the club as a whole has screwed up the transfer.

Hope this is clear once and for all.



Okay my FSG court statement was a sly dig, I apologise for that.

This isn't a siege on FSG for everything , this is in regard to their transfer strategy and in that context I'm letting loose because they are solely to blame, Brendan Rodgers, Comoli came out with their opinions and we are all too familiar with the infamous transfer commitee pre-Klopp, theirs no smoke without fire, this is a full onslaught on FSG in regards to this transfer strategy, if it's not Ian Ayre, it's this new EA hotshot, coming out with comments about doing a Leicester, they are FSG's puppets whomever they hire who isn't football related. it's written all the wall and they deserve all the stick for VvD ,

FSG have done good in other areas which I'm happy with (Keeping Anfield, signing Klopp , showing willingness to listen to fans with walk out) I'm not upset about these situations but they deserve full blame for VvD,

Every has their own opinions on FSG, we all want success for LFC, my scepticism comes from not knowing if FSG want sucess for liverpool "IF" it doesn't align with their moneyball strategy despite Klopp earning that transfer kitty. Klopp can spend 100$ million on VvD if he wants to spend it that way! It's his choice to use the money how he wants and shouldn't have to deal with his own commitee deterring him based on computer analyses of player worth, or the possibility of the conspiracy of the director of football purposely sabotaging the deal to deter Klopp from spending that much


Last edited by LFCDownUnder; 22/06/17 06:07 PM.

It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By wilkij1975
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By Hercules/AF 58
Agreed LFCDU, but for some reason it seems to suit a couple of posters here to always try and lessen the blame on FSG when they fu*k up.


Yep that's true, especially when they pick and choose information to forget that is crucial , like how on earth is Klopp to blame when the only reason we are in for VvD is because of Klopp ???

I'm puzzled how they never address this blatant peice of information in blaming issue.

I think these are the same people who haven't read FSG's court statement upon buying the club, kindve a depressing statement but basically sums up FSG's motives exactly.


How about you choosing to not mention the fact that Klopp illegally met a player? As I've said many times and am getting bored of doing so (you obviously choosing to ignore this info.), I don't blame Klopp but has to take his share of it for his part in it.


No he doesn't deserve to take his share, his share is credit for convincing the player, his share is accredited , FSG feked it up ultimately , I've mentioned Klopp multiple times it's illegal , ye but I don't care because he would've not had the opportunity to convince him if not, he had to do it, I'm not sure about conspiracy of FSG purposely misleading him , but ultimately if all clubs do it and what Klopp did is normal , than that leaves the outlier in LFC's management which stinks of this type of transfer mishaps for a far longer time to properly make a more accurate assumption that FSG's transfer strategy that has been passed down to the suits are not good enough , so blame isn't on Klopp, just credit for convincing the player illegal or otherwise, everyone was shocked with the statement because it was completely unnecessary and stunk of naive non-footballing FSG stunt.

This blame is on FSG, if you want to get all philosophical then yes technically it's the whole clubs mistake but it's really FSG's fault for their strategy they do time and time again regardless of club or target significance


He talked to a player illegally. He takes some blame along with everyone else involved.

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
L
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
L Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
There is a bigger picture that goes beyond Klopp making a mistake on tapping up, it's FSG's strategy which doesn't seem to change after 7 years , even with a manager like Klopp, that's the worry and that's why VvD is so significant now and why FSG have a chance to show some form of intent with Klopp's targets beyond petty offers.

Klopp has faults too, it's not like he's perfect like he seemed tactically naive and inflexible during January, February , even now our attack without Sturridge or mane is blunt against deep defenses , that's not FSG's fault!

But VvD isn't klopp's fault and always will be FSG's fault


It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
H Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
When Southampton said enough is enough, they we're talking about the press leaks by the "Suits", it was this press chatter that the player had chosen LFC, and thus cutting out the bidding war, that angered them and caused them to report us to the FA. The PR part of LFCs work is firmly under FSG control, so they are the ones that fu*k'd up. Not Klopp. Therefore the blame for this transfer disaster is firmly on FSG. They're incompetent innocents abroad who couldn't close a deal if it was their front door.

Page 11 of 19 1 2 … 9 10 11 12 13 … 18 19

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion