KopTalk.com Forums VIVE LA PARIS VIVE LA FRANCE

How many have Assad and ISIS killed the redjohn?

i did read over half the bombing raids by Britain in Iraq were turned back because of risk of civilian harm the majority of strikes are battlefield called in by Arab forces fighting Islamic state. This is vital miliary support without this quite probably by now the whole of Syria and Iraq would be under Islamic state control. Yes inevitably there will be accidents and civilian casualties but allowing Islamic state to gain more territory as some on here want to do would involve mass geocide of civilians. No one is suggesting military action is the only lever the Vienna convention is working hard to secure a peaceful political solution to the Syrian civil war that would be impossible if Syria is controlled either whole or in part by Islamic state

We should consider dropping bombs on Israel and Saudi Arabia too then, Turkey certainly, not to mention China and Russia. There's also parts of South Vietnam (small parts)that nearly recovered from chemical weapons dropped to save them - I reckon a blanket bombing campaign will help finish them off.

Taking miliary action is a very last resort most rational people can see there will be no peace in Syria or the Middle East or throughout the world without removing Islamic state not my opinion that of the United Nations. You obviously think they are wrong the Syrian government are wrong the Iraq government are wrong and problably ever nation on earth including probably North Korea thinks we need to deal with Islamic terror which threatens his all its not a war between nations but a war between ideologies within nations. The hub of this terror is in Syria and Iraq first Job is to remove it then work to a poltical settlement in Syria via the Vienna talks then we have to deal with the problem embedded in our societies including in Britain. Doing nothing or inviting Islamic state round for a cup of tea as you would is the preserve of a few leftie or anti capitalist kranks who would not last a minute under Islamic state rule

No, because "because taking the violent route and repeating the same mistake 15 times and expecting a different result this time" is something an animal or less evolved species would do. It's not me being mean, it's jus fact.

Ask Albert Einstein.

Bollox! You don't like it so are doing the tolerant leftie abuse thing that you all do. I expected more from you if I'm honest.

I notice the Muslim in America who shot dead 14 people was a nice guy by all accounts. In these incidents which are now commonplace they always say the same thing he / she was a nice person and no one would imagine they would do such an act. Same with the London bombers one was a schoolteacher the guy in Scotland who drove a flaming truck at an airport was a doctor, people normally born and raised in western societies that can't be explained away by foreign policy.

Sixties, the simple fact you have something against Islam as a religion points to the fact that you know nothing about it and thereby discredits your arguments. I really have better things to do than educate you on the topic of Islamic beliefs.

You are right, I don't like violence. But I am no leftie.

same was said about the columbine shooter, I didn't notice you pointing out he was an American, Christian guy. I didn't notice you calling for a joint bombing of the states.