KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum What have FSG brought to the table ?

Liverpool vish are based in the north west of england. Even with the regeneration it will always be different to the west end of London.

Our rivals are in the north west the big manchester clubs essentially these are who we directly compete with fan wise. I dont agree the stadium and match fans are less important they are an intrinsic part of the game and sport. Thats obvious.

And I personally believe in the future people will tire of watching a vitual product not just for football but many things. The human race cannot evolve watching a screen what sort of a life is that. The population of the north west is expanding rapidly and although sponsorship and TV viewing income will always be the majority of major clubs income the match going experience will in future expand.

If you think this is wrong then how do you see the sport developing in an enclosed TV studio ?

City are building now Marko bringing the stadium to 57k and they have half the fan base of us and can expand beyond that if needed. But you are right its not easy but nothing worth striving for ever is.

And again Marko to repeat for the millionth time I am not saying build a 90k stadium

65k and future options to expand further if needed to a maximum of 90k which gives us the same scope and united and city

Now you are basing your arguments on the fact that sitting in front if a TV is not the right way for the human race to evolve? Stanley, i get you point, totally but i still think this is our best option ATM.

As far as evolution goes and the evolution of the sport, media is the way forward i am afraid. I am not saying i like it, but its how it is.

Without question TV and media is going to be a huge part of the future. But not exclusively Marko nor is the TV experience divorced from the event and its environment in fact without the event there is no product. People still want to see real things. If you look at the global economy China / India with its huge population will watch on TV but they will also want to see for themselves allied with the massive population growth and wealth in the north west of england there is potential for huge demand to attend games. City and United are making long terms plans for this, we are not. Which is a shame as Liverpool is a fantastic and beautiful sea port city now with its own cruise liner terminal.

The size and quality of the stadium have very little direct baring on sponsorship, this is based on, are we a safe bet in terms of face value, i.e. would we, liverpool, damage the reputation of the sponsor in any way, and the total head count of exposure, which is less down to number of people in the stadium and more the number of people watching on tv, as this is the far greater percentage.

When talking about the stadium you say there will be huge demand

When talking about ticket prices you say the games are not selling out and you're being priced out

Your arguments are as strong as a flacid c0ck

You have not been following the thread long term there will be a correction and fans will return to the game. I may be wrong of course

But it's madness to build any form of long term infrastructure without allowing for change. Our rivals are we are not

And Elliot saying things like flacid cock does not promote you in a good light in an intelligent discussion

Nor does constantly contradicting yourself