KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 61 of 103 1 2 … 59 60 61 62 63 … 102 103
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Vish when I say investment portfolios I mean portfolios of internal capital investments not stocks and shares. The other thing when you talk about business cases you say so as if a business case process was generic in all situations. It's not it depends on the company some have aggressive thresholds some less so, FSG to me seem very aggressive and only looking at projects that pay back within a few years, This to me demonstrates they see the club as a short term investment only and as long as it delivers their required return they don't care what state the club ends up in or whether Liverpool,can compete at the top level in 30 years.

I do

And anyone who calls them-self a fan should do so too.

As for the funding £500m or £150m both easily affordable it depends on the appetite for risk and the time you evaluate over which for so stadium should be at least 30 years.

And the notion you have we will build another proper stadium in the future won't happen this is our chance (particularly with the city being regenerated) and we must take it


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Vish when I say investment portfolios I mean portfolios of internal capital investments not stocks and shares. The other thing when you talk about business cases you say so as if a business case process was generic in all situations. It's not it depends on the company some have aggressive thresholds some less so, FSG to me seem very aggressive and only looking at projects that pay back within a few years, This to me demonstrates they see the club as a short term investment only and as long as it delivers their required return they don't care what state the club ends up in or whether Liverpool,can compete at the top level in 30 years.

I do

And anyone who calls them-self a fan should do so too.

As for the funding £500m or £150m both easily affordable it depends on the appetite for risk and the time you evaluate over which for so stadium should be at least 30 years.

And the notion you have we will build another proper stadium in the future won't happen this is our chance (particularly with the city being regenerated) and we must take it


Stop your [oops] of defining what a fan should do or not, not all fans are unreasonable as you.

Coming back to the business case, you keep on forgetting that we haven't been able to cover our costs during the last few years and spending on infrastructure that MIGHT, I repeat MIGHT, in 10 years time be useful is complete madness. Any reasonable person should be able to understand this.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Well the last few years vish covered the costs of and removal costs of your mate king kenny the greatest manager ever where had we not wasted that money we would be halfway to a new ground now. In fact I would not be surprised if that is why FSG are going for the cheap option. In terms of maintainable profit if Liverpool football club are making a loss in perpetuity then we should not be considering any ground development including refurbishment of anfield, But I suspect when exception costs are stripped out Liverpool, are very profitable indeed. If we can afford a £150 m development then we can afford £500m development in the grand scheme of things neither are a lot of money in an age when a single player with contract can easily cost £75m. So I am afraid my friend you are taking tommy rot


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
Because 150mil = 500mil ....

E
Eliot
Unregistered
Eliot
Unregistered
E
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Well the last few years vish covered the costs of and removal costs of your mate king kenny the greatest manager ever where had we not wasted that money we would be halfway to a new ground now. In fact I would not be surprised if that is why FSG are going for the cheap option. In terms of maintainable profit if Liverpool football club are making a loss in perpetuity then we should not be considering any ground development including refurbishment of anfield, But I suspect when exception costs are stripped out Liverpool, are very profitable indeed. If we can afford a £150 m development then we can afford £500m development in the grand scheme of things neither are a lot of money in an age when a single player with contract can easily cost £75m. So I am afraid my friend you are taking tommy rot


Bhahahaha
hahaha
























































hahaha

E
Eliot
Unregistered
Eliot
Unregistered
E
haha

E
Eliot
Unregistered
Eliot
Unregistered
E
hahahaha

E
Eliot
Unregistered
Eliot
Unregistered
E
hahaha

Page 61 of 103 1 2 … 59 60 61 62 63 … 102 103

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion