So to compare us to stoke or Sunderland is a pretty poor comparison
I'm still waiting for an answer as to where I insulted you. It seemed to stem from the fact that I pointed out to you that as an accountant you'd understand inflation rates. That somehow has become an insult
I think you pointed out I was incredibly biased due to my disagreeing with you. Not the greatest insult in the world but demonstrating your inability to counter what I am saying which is we are cutting our cloth to suit john Henry's willingness to invest. Ok all clubs suffer that limitation even city but we are one if the biggest clubs in the world and we are being starved of investment, the plans for the ground are a disgrace and for me personally it will be great as I keep the great seats we have but I am thinking of the bigger picture
I have repeatedly countered your arguments and stated facts particularly with reference to commercial improvements. You have blindly refuted these and generally just ignored any of the posts where facts are used which is why I described you as biased
You're first accusation of me insulting you came after I said you were an accountant and has continued with most of your responses to me (although you haven't responded to a large number which factually counter your argument)
It is not john Henry. He has maintained from the first day they took over Liverpool that we would be a self sustaining club. Consisting we routinely rank in the top 15 revenue generating clubs in the world and should be back in the top 10 after this season, that combined with a reduction in wage/turnover ratio should leave us plenty of money to compete which it has as we have the 3rd highest net spend since they took over