The stadium could be financed by long term borrowing prefernce shares or debentures and naming rights. If FSG are as good as their fans on here say naming rights should be no problem.
What's best for LFC though us not what's best for FSG guess which John Henry will be doing ?
The best for FSG is to bump the brand and spend as little as possible and sell leaving the next owners to pick up the pieces in the meantime the club stands still and out rivals build bigger and better stadia and pull further away from us.
But the FSG fan club are happy
1) I can't speak for everyone on here, but I've read enough posts from others trying to get through to you that we don't really give a toss about FSG - most people couldn't care less who the club was owned by as long as everything is
realistically going smoothly and heading in the right direction, both on and off the field.
The stance is not pro FSG, it's anti your negativity.
2)Where on earth are you getting all this "what's best for FSG" doom & gloom talk from???? I'm not saying this wont ever happen, but you are clinging to this worst case scenario like your life depends on it - and it is, up to and including the present day, completely and utterly unfounded.
Fair play to being cautious or sceptical, but you also have to be reasonable and give benefit of the doubt pal.
