But why does it have to be so extreme and devoid of complexity? We are not doing as well as we hoped so all is shiit, we are doomed, the owners are trying to ruin us, our players are all crap, etc. etc. Why not take a more measured approach like our US owners are not learning fast enough, or their mistakes are proving costly, or they are too slow to react, or they are over-correcting after the Dalglish/Comoli spending, or we are a few players short despite showing promise, or we have only shown marginal improvement on ownership issues.... and so on?
Where have I said we're doing shiit? Again I have not said they are trying to ruin us.. That's a nonsensical point to make.. Why would anyone who purchased an asset want to ruin it?
I have never said anything like it... Your the one who's now being hypocritical and contradictory by using extreme terms which I have not used!
