I can see whith my own eyes its not the same just on scanning the net , granted the data is never 100 pc reliable wherever its published ..
http://www.onebooker.com/en/2010/09/are-...-comes-to-debt/this ones 2008-9 season LFC were paying 43million interest and profit was 12 million. Look at the link - the other clubs didnt have this massive discrepancy , most were running on even or profit.
Then the last figures i can find are in the guardian, for the season ending 2010,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/may/19/football-club-accounts-debt liverpool were paying if the figures are correct 18 percent interest. Still too high but less than arsenal . Debt is 123 million. You are right in saying that nesv are different as they have the finances to clear all the debt. But why is this a bad thing? Damned it they do damned if they don't- But why should they? Its like a little kid saying to his dad you earn enough to buy me that 4000 pound bike. Why should be buy it?
Some fans need to grow up!