KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
T
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
no you understand the issue but are only revealing half of it on the thread as you don't like fsg which is fair enough but dont try and mix up all the debt together. There are several parts to the debt of lfc holdings and other companies. The debt is less now than it was.

Last edited by Toothy; 01/09/12 01:29 PM.
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 562
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 562
Originally Posted By: Toothy
I can see whith my own eyes its not the same just on scanning the net , granted the data is never 100 pc reliable wherever its published ..

http://www.onebooker.com/en/2010/09/are-...-comes-to-debt/
this ones 2008-9 season LFC were paying 43million interest and profit was 12 million. Look at the link - the other clubs didnt have this massive discrepancy , most were running on even or profit.

Then the last figures i can find are in the guardian, for the season ending 2010,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/may/19/football-club-accounts-debt


liverpool were paying if the figures are correct 18 percent interest. Still too high but less than arsenal . Debt is 123 million. You are right in saying that nesv are different as they have the finances to clear all the debt. But why is this a bad thing? Damned it they do damned if they don't- But why should they? Its like a little kid saying to his dad you earn enough to buy me that 4000 pound bike. Why should be buy it?
Some fans need to grow up!



F*cks sake just wanted to sign a striker whistle

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: Toothy
no you understand the issue but are only revealing half of it on the thread as you don't like fsg which is fair enough but dont try and mix up all the debt together. There are several parts to the debt of lfc holdings and other companies. The debt is less now than it was.


Why ? how can it be unless there was a share issue?


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
T
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
As far as I am aware LFC is a private limited company wholly owned by FSG. FSG financed £300m to buy it. That financing has a cost. Please try to understand before one of us dies.


Financing has a cost? I didnt know that.

I must pull you on one point . You said I didnt read your original thread because according to you I said that FSG had removed all debt from the company. I wrote that the interest payement were less now than under hicks. So you try and read replies before accusing people of not reading your threads.


Regarding the spending, they paid off a large part of the debt , certainly liverpool don't have massive interest payments now.
Please dont patronize me because I dont agree with your (badly written and not backed up with figures or facts) thread
Thanks grin

Last edited by Toothy; 01/09/12 01:34 PM.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Why is the debt less toothy ? have we had a share issue?

how can it be less?


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
T
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
You thought FSG were going to pay 300 million cash to rsb? If you are paying 18 million interest as opposed to 45 million interest for example the final payment (unless there has been an agreement on the final sum (unlikely) will be less, in effect your 'debt' is less.
The original sum borrowed is still there.

Hicks borrowed with money he didnt have

FSG have the money.

Simple. You want to force FSG to buy a 50 million player because they have it . Fair enough but that doesnt mean they are robbing the club. To suggest otherwise when they bought the donkey for 35 million is untrue

Last edited by Toothy; 01/09/12 01:39 PM.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
This showes exactly what I was saying most reds fans have not got a clue how FSG are conning us. Yes they are very clever too clever by half.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: Toothy
You thought FSG were going to pay 300 million cash to rsb?


?


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
T
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
This showes exactly what I was saying most reds fans have not got a clue how FSG are conning us. Yes they are very clever too clever by half.


Explain. Give some figures then

Where is the c0n?

Last edited by Toothy; 01/09/12 01:39 PM.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Toothy I have explained to you over and over again and its obvious its gone over your head. Have a cup of tea mate.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Page 4 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion