so you believe in the conspiracy that manchester united cooked this up one day just decided to do it , come on be serious .
No you're putting words in my mouth. I didn't state or even suggest they cooked this up. Keep it simple Faz and you might start to hear what other people are saying sometimes.
What they did do was take advantage of a situation where Liverpool were on the back foot. Obviously something had happened, but was it as bad as Evra and Fergie made it out to be at the time? We now know it certainly wasn't.
You said you read the report. In which case you will know that the original accusation from Evra was that he had been called a 'N1gger'. Fergie also used this word when he spoke to the referee.
A few points for you to consider:
- Why didn't Fergie and the United management contact Dalglish and the Liverpool management first and try and sort it out that way?
- Why did they use the inflamotory word 'N1gger' when telling the referee after the game, but on during the game Evra used the less inflamatory word 'black'
- Who or what made Evra exaggerate his claim from 'black' to 'N1gger'?
- Why did the FA meet with Evra 3 times in secret leading up to the hearing and not share either the fact that they had met Evra or the notes of the meeting until the morning of the trial?
- Why was Evra allowed to give his version of events whilst watching a video whilst Suarez was asked to give evidence without the video?
Wake up Faz.