in the summer last year dalglish got rid of cole, aquilani,poulson,meireles etc etc spent millions on as he said his top signing to finish lower then the team of so-called crabs and fans back him , ok i dont think they could go down but i do fear for liverpool if dalglish and the present set up stays .
totaly agree fazakerley, I think if Dalglish stays in charge there is a real possibility we could go down next season, the form table does'nt lie and since January we have remained in the bottom three, there is absolutely nothing to suggest it will be any different next season with him in charge.
The form table doesn't lie, but you do. On form since the turn of the year, Liverpool have scored 18 points, one fewer than Stoke at 16th in the league. So actually we've not remained in the bottom 3, though we were there for some time. But let's not allow the facts to get in the way of our sweeping statements, shall we?
And Faz, Dalglish did not "get rid of" Cole and Aquilani - they're still on our books.
And Stanley, I don't know what team you were watching when Hodgson got the sack, but they were not the world beaters you suggest.
I really don't know what to say to you people anymore. We invested 35m in the squad - aka we added Andy Carroll to what Hodgson left behind. Say what you like about net spend, the value of the squad increased by Carroll's transfer fee. Compared with last season we slipped 6 points lower on the table, but won a cup and reached another cup final. I'm sorry, but there is absolutely nothing to suggest we will be relegated next season.
Get over yourselves. Dalglish had an average season in a league that was unexpectedly tight at the top (69 points required for a CL place!), and there were many factors out of his control, including the loss of Suarez for 8 matches due to a ridiculous ban from a trumped up charge.
Now maybe you expected us to win the league, because you carry on like the world has ended. I expected a top 4 finish, but the more I look at how the season has gone the more I think that we were never going to have enough fuel in the tank for that. We had too many changes to bed in, too many players losing form, Gerrard and Lucas each injured for half the season or more. I'm not trying to make excuses but once you've missed top 4 your league position is irrelevant if you've already qualified for Europe, so I expect there were motivation issues within the squad after the Arsenal loss - the players are still human, after all.
This season was bad - but I really don't think it was anywhere near as bad as you make out. Liverpool hasn't threatened top 4 since 09, so how is a mere 35m going to make us suddenly turn the corner when last season's top 3 each
invested more, some up to 3 times that?
And don't come at me with the "Dalglish spent 110m!" story - I'm tired of it. If you sell 50m pounds worth of striker you lose that player's value as well as his goals. If you sell an entire squad for 100m and get another 35m on top of that from the transfer kitty, how much is your squad worth? That's right 135m. Not 135m
MORE than it was worth before (because "the manager spent 135m!"), which is what all you people who dislike net spend fail to grasp every single time the argument comes up. Get a clue already!
I don't know whether sacking Dalglish will make us better next season. I expect the risk of bringing in a new manager (who may also want to sell the Aggers of the squad in order to buy more Poulsens) at least equals the risk of keeping the present one (who hopefully will not buy more Hendersons and Adams because of how well the present ones are working out). If Dalglish can learn from his mistakes this season we have no reason to be so negative, so let's see whether he's given the chance to do so and whether he chooses to take it.