It's clear to me that you think Kenny is the man, based on the games/competitions you decide to look at. I on the other hand am looking at the overall picture and am coming to a different conclusion. We'll leave it there shall we?
We're all entitled to our own misguided opinions. You say "overall picture" but look only at win/loss numbers as though they mean everything. I say "look beyond just the non-equivalent results, look beyond the non-equivalent number of days of preparation the managers had when beginning their tenures, look beyond the non-comparative opposition strength or who had which stronger players to choose from, look also at the club unity, look also at what the fans want, look also at what your managerial god wants [anyone other than Liverpool, straight from the horse's mouth], look also at the transfer window activity, look also at where the club lies in relation to its peers in England [aka the EPL league and form tables], for THAT is the overall picture of Kenny Dalglish's second stint in charge". Kenny ticks enough boxes to not need replacing despite being eliminated from the FA Cup and Europa League competitions, not that I think he couldn't have done better there. You however seem to want to hang him because 1) he couldn't beat Braga after the Greek gave them an undeserved penalty at home, and because 2) we had 2 first half injuries and two dreadful mistakes from the Greek against West Brom, which was embarrassing but wasn't something he actually had much control over. If only Kenny didn't need to keep playing Krygiakos! The only conclusion I'm drawing is that you're not looking at the overall picture. So yeah, let's leave it at that.
