KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 15 of 19 1 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046
It's not over till the f at lady sings or maybe till the fat ba5tard fu.ks off!

Acari #82315 14/10/10 11:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 18
D
Trialist
Offline
Trialist
D
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 18
Not liking how long this court case in Dallas is taking! Been over half an hour!

Dukey78 #82319 15/10/10 12:15 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
V
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
V
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
Just thought of one thing: What if those 2 [oops] had paid as much attention to the club as they have when it comes to blocking the sale of the same club!

Strange feeling that they seem to hate us all the way through, but when it comes to finally part, they start stalling! crazy

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,046
yes they hate football fans especially English ones; They think they are anti semetic and will continue to pay exhorbitant fees to watch their team perform even after the team disintegrates due to asset stripping and they are right about fans continuing to pay whatever happens to watch the match

Last edited by Armitage Shanks; 15/10/10 12:22 AM.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
V
1st Team Squad
Offline
1st Team Squad
V
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
Seriously: Talk about wrong focus!

Theese geezers will never accomplish anything in their miserable lives!

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,063
K
Moderator
Offline
Moderator
K
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,063
Before Jordan dismissed the parties till tomorrow morning, first thing, attorney Stephen Fox, repping Hicks and Kop Holdings, told the judge that "our folks are aggressively working out an arrangement with RBS to take care of the debt." Meaning: Hicks and George Gillett would pay the close to £500 million owed and then look for someone other than NESV to buy the team. Jordan said, "I hope those talks continue," but said he needs more time to consider the UK judge's ruling before making a decision concerning yesterday's temporary restraining order.

http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2010/10/at_this_very_moment_in_a_downt.php


Life is only a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbRmJ_2nqyg
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 711
Under 18 Player
Offline
Under 18 Player
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 711
if that happens i will fly over to texas personally to put hicks in a [oops] coma

Last edited by stegabba19; 15/10/10 03:59 AM.

Goodnese me, Could this be, Insdustrial Disease?
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 328
D
Under 16 Player
Offline
Under 16 Player
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 328
10.06am: Sky News's Mark Kleinman is now also reporting that H&G have lifted their Temporary Restraining Order.

10.04am: "Talks betwen Mill and Hicks have been taking place for the past 48hrs - they basically have until 4.30pm to do a deal," tweets Ben Smith.

10.02am: Sources tell me that the Temporary Restraining Order in Texas has been lifted. How this can possibly be, I don't know. But, that is what a well-informed source insists.

Deco #82391 15/10/10 02:12 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 328
D
Under 16 Player
Offline
Under 16 Player
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 328
10.07am: David Gordon has just sent this email which might help explain what is going on:


"Can Hicks really offload his shares to Mill Financial? If you read the TRO issued in Dallas, towards the end it says:

"Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that Defendants and their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with any of them, are temporarily enjoined from engaging in the following acts:
a) Completing, closing or otherwise consummating a purported sale of Liverpool FC to Defendant NESV or any related entities as provided in the October 6, 2010 Share Purchase Agreement or on similar terms;
b) Without Plaintiff's consent, taking any action to modify, pledge, sell, transfer, seize, foreclose on or dispose of Plaintiffs' ownership interest in Liverpool FC"

Now, call this wishful thinking, but if it says that "those persons in active concert or participation with" the Defendants cannot do any of these things, surely that means Mr Hicks, who is part of the LFC board, cannot do this either? I guess it doesn't say that they can't sell to anyone, but then wouldn't Mill Financial fall under the "related entities" considering they own Gillett's stake?"

Deco #82393 15/10/10 02:18 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 103
K
Under 16 Player
Offline
Under 16 Player
K
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 103
I have the feeling we have been dicked!

Page 15 of 19 1 2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion