KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#82355 15/10/10 04:08 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 93
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 93
I had a thought...I still wonder if Lims bid was just enough the first time around to do the same thing NESV did, offer enough to pay off the debt, and purchase the club without enriching H&G.

That seemed to be everyone"s goal to get a rock bottom price with out enriching H&G. Lim or NESV could have easily offered 500M or more but any extra would have went to H&G. Then it really is about who is best suited to run the club? The board did not go for a bid-off between the two, due to time I bet, just asked both to make their best proposal and went with who they liked. Not sure there. If Lim had bid 1-200mil more than NESV, the board really would have had to consider it.

Strange stuff but I still firmly believe they made the right choice with NESV. A problem NESV may face is continuing lawsuits form H&G after the sale. Hopefully they have the stones and legal position to withstand all of it because we know H&G will not just walk away. If they do not, NESV could face serious (like we need to sell this club serious) financial losses with a successful lawsuit from H&G.

Last edited by RedThunder; 15/10/10 04:09 AM.
RedThunder #82358 15/10/10 06:56 AM
T
thundyr
Unregistered
thundyr
Unregistered
T
I think that it was pretty clear even before Kenny Huang and his big mouth left that the only bids on the table were of the "We'll scrap the debt, look at the stadium issue, and invest in the squad" type. The latter clause is actually a freebee anyway, because without the crippling debt repayments LFC can invest in the squad without outside assistance. Everyone was offering the minimum because they knew that Hicks had left himself with no backdoor - take our offer now, or we'll wait until RBS repossess and then present the same offer to them. I honestly can't see how anyone working for LFC could take Lim's bid seriously because of the words "Manchester United" on his bankroll, so NESV would have been selected by default (and they had to decide by the 5th or Henry would walk).

The alternative was to simply wait until the 15th, but then Hicks would almost certainly have claimed his $1.6bn damages against the board for failing to sell the club. This was always going to end up in court; anyone thinking otherwise was a damn fool. Hicks thought he had all the cards, but everyone knows he's bluffing and isn't wearing any pants. So the board screwed him by accepting NESV's bid, knowing they would win in the High Court because Hicks would disgrace himself in the aftermath. If the Dallas judge rules Hicks attempted to deliberately mislead the US court with his injunction he's toast. What would make that all the more satisfying is that he basically took the gun he had put down on the boardroom table intending to use it against LFC, and instead used it to shoot himself.

Couldn't have happened to a nicer man.

#82364 15/10/10 09:23 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 93
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 93
Agreed. And as I understand it, that TX judge is a little [oops] he did not have all of the details including it had been ruled on by the British High Court. I really hope they slap a contempt charge on his sorry ass in High Court and in TX.

The shame is never ending for that fecker. I am still going to get a jersey with "Hicks" and 144 on it and frame it and place it in my den.


Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion