KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
F
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
What i mean is i don't wish the club to become vulgar like Manchester City who are acting like a drug dealer who is dealing big time its all false , i want LFC to be able to earn it way to the top yes with some help from a new owner/investor , but i don't want to see players just coming to LFC just because LFC can pay multi millions for a messi or the likes , the club takeover would be for me , yes the debt paid , the stadium started and some but not an obscene about of money to start the club in the right direction , because in the right circumstances the club does and can generate its own funds , this is just my view on the club and its possible take over , maybe i see the club with rose tinted glasses as i am old skool but it just my view .

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,063
K
Moderator
Moderator
K Offline
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,063
kirdi having connections with the gillett family says it all for me. he shouldn't be allowed near anfield...


Life is only a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbRmJ_2nqyg
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 570
S
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 570
Yeah know what you mean, there is a little bit of deja-vu here, Moores had a choice and messed it up and although delighted we going to have new owners I'm just hoping that we get the right new owners!

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 93
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 93
fazakeley red my thoughts are exact, BUT with a boss in roy hodgson (a manager with sense) extravagent spending will not happen, just improvements to the squad, say 2 major players per year


one martin kelly!
theres only one martin kelly!
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
Originally Posted By: mark waters
fazakeley red my thoughts are exact, BUT with a boss in roy hodgson (a manager with sense) extravagent spending will not happen, just improvements to the squad, say 2 major players per year


100% in agreement, but what if the new owners insist on a spend spend spend regime?

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 93
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 93
growler i really hope we do not spend spend spend like man city.... we had great success from the late 60's to 1990, in the 00's weve sort of "woke up", point im making is this club has a proud past 18 leagues 5 european cups and the rest.

man city on the other hand have won nothing since the 70's so their fans are loving the big spending and current regeame, but if the prospective new owners start flashing the cash then it would go against alot of our proud past, yes look to the future, BUT the money wouldnt be a bottomless pot it would dry up eventually leaving the club in meltdown in the very distant future, money needs to be spent on the new stadium this will bring in approx £3M per game in gate receipts and maybe upgrades to melwood etc


one martin kelly!
theres only one martin kelly!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 999
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 999
Originally Posted By: thekop_swede
kirdi having connections with the gillett family says it all for me. he shouldn't be allowed near anfield...
I think it's a last ditch attempt to boost the price up for the other interested parties.


I am Batman
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 377
R
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
R Offline
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 377
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1
What i mean is i don't wish the club to become vulgar like Manchester City who are acting like a drug dealer who is dealing big time its all false , i want LFC to be able to earn it way to the top yes with some help from a new owner/investor , but i don't want to see players just coming to LFC just because LFC can pay multi millions for a messi or the likes , the club takeover would be for me , yes the debt paid , the stadium started and some but not an obscene about of money to start the club in the right direction , because in the right circumstances the club does and can generate its own funds , this is just my view on the club and its possible take over , maybe i see the club with rose tinted glasses as i am old skool but it just my view .
Lovely sentiments mate but it's simply not going to happen, most Liverpool supporters are glory hunters which mean they dont care where the money comes from, who it's spent on or how much they pay these mercenery type players to play just as long as they win stuff. Your old skool values are the same as mine but we have been swallowed up by this new type of fan. I like Roy as manager but I can see him being replaced in the not so distant future simply because he wont fit the profile of this new regime whowever it may be, bit like what happend to Mark Hughes when those Arabs took over, just get the feeling he was brought in as a stop gap for some horrible reason.

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,416
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,416


"Romance has broke down
This boy is crack'in up"

So not a moderator

Valar Morghulis
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 343
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 343
anything will be an improvement on the current shower of muppets. can't get much worse.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion