KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 233
T
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
T Offline
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 233
i was watching lfc tv and noticed that fabio aurelio was still training with us i two theories around this
1.Hes just training with us to get fit and find a new club
2.Roy could be running the rule over him he was linked to fulham before roy joined and with only two weeks to the start of this season we dont have any left backs and maybe with all the new sports scientists we have got recently maybe there could be a return i mean aurelio is certainly taking his time to find a club

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,036
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,036
Liverpool agreed to let him train with them until he finds a new club. Hodg might pursuade him to stay tho.


What do you mean my birth certificate expired?
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 233
T
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
T Offline
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 233
thanx for the info just came as a bit of a surprise but i hope we do keep him if he stays fit he is quality and better than any of the other left backs we have been linked with if only he wasnt so injury prone

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,243
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,243
its a bit far fetched but id love him to stay, been a good servant to the club.



Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,391
L
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
L Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,391
How can you say he's been a good servant to the club, more like we've been a good servant to him, he's been with us since 2006 and has so many injuries that weve only had one good season out of him, an when we offer him a pay as you play he has the cheek to say no he's worth a contract, he shouldn't be even using melwood to train to find another club we've already been to much of a charity to him

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
I would keep him but a new LB is still essential to our squad because Aurelio gets injured alot. Class player when fit though.


Back to Back World Champions baby!
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 835
C
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
C Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 835
Easily the best of our recent left backs, but far too injury prone. If we keep him on a pay as you play deal then fair enough, otherwise we'd just be throwing money away.

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,391
L
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
L Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,391
What's the point in even keeping him cus he'd be injured when he's back up so we'd need another one anyway

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,243
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,243
Originally Posted By: LFC1984RHll
How can you say he's been a good servant to the club, more like we've been a good servant to him, he's been with us since 2006 and has so many injuries that weve only had one good season out of him, an when we offer him a pay as you play he has the cheek to say no he's worth a contract, he shouldn't be even using melwood to train to find another club we've already been to much of a charity to him


he's committed a quarter of his career at liverpool, i'll always remember him as a solid consistent performer. scored a few goals for us against chelsea and the mancs. being prone to injury is his weakness but it can't be easy as a player going through that sort of thing, alright yea its easy money that we've ''[oops] up the wall'' so to speak, but i think the lad would much rather prefer to be playing week in week out and we got him for nothing. there are better players that have had worse injury records than him. always performed well in whenever called upon and always pleased me to see him on the team sheet. to me he's served the club well



Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,391
L
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
L Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,391
The fact your picking out 2 moments where he scored against Chelsea and man utd is your highlights of his 1/4 of his career for us!

It's not good enough, he's been out for to long during his career to call him a good servant to our club, if he'd have played the amount of games nearer to what carragher and Sami did in the past 5 years I could agree with you otherwise and I'm not bein abusive I just think it's bull. There's been players who have played more and not been recognized as good servants for the club and I just can't get my head round why you think aurellio has

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion