That's not gonna wash.... FSG will have to buy a lot of top players to even begin to heal that rift. Time for 50+1 rule in England.
So are you demanding they spend hundreds of millions on players and player wages. This is in part the wider financial problem in football which lead to this whole debacle as the owners were looking to make more money for their unsustainable teams.
Unless you are 'lucky' enough to be owned by an oil state football can't carry on spending 50+ million for average players at best. This is why Chelsea and City backed out first because they don't need the money.
This is why we take the approach we do because we can't compete financially with City and Chelsea.
This is the point I was making, we have opposed ticket price increases, copyright issues when FSG trademarks names, we have opposed the ESL now. Football costs are raising, we have increased the contracts of our players like VvD/Salah/Mane/Allisson based on success, rightly so, but now our salary is huge, with these players getting older and value/re-sale reducing.
We cannot have it all, if we want Liverpool to be competitive and win PL & CL, FSG need more to generate funds, that's why they joined the ESL, as that would have given more funds and close the gap between us & City/Chelsea. Come the summer we will all be saying we need a new striker, we need better CB cover etc, this all costs huge money in transfers & pay.
FSG bought us over expecting FFP to kick in to level the competition, they knew they could improve/increase Liverpool marketing/sponsorship/merchandise, increasing our income so FFP would put us in a strong position going forward if sugar daddy owners could not financially dope their club. FFP has been blown out of the water as UEFA have no teeth and have let Man City walk, Man City are in the semi final for a CL competition they were been banned from!!!!!