KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 5,936
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 5,936
Literally the day after City eventually surrender the title to us, they are negotiating a deal for Koulibaly said to be in the region of 72m with 15m in add ons.

Allover the media yesterday and today that Liverpool are about to offer Lovren + Cash to Napoli for Koulibaly.

It does make sense to get another quality CB because there'll be enough games to keep everyone happy. Matip's injuries are a liability now and it's fairly certain Lovren will be on his way. Gomez has been very good paired with VVD but he has also been cover for LB/RB and there'll be enough games to rotate VVD Koulibaly and Gomez at CB.

The idea City are to get Koulibaly would be potentially tragic for us because it is their current achilles heel finding somebody to partner Laporte.

Although we surrendered tamely over Werner, so how could we possibly stump up 20m+ more for Koulibaly?

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By Pickles
Literally the day after City eventually surrender the title to us, they are negotiating a deal for Koulibaly said to be in the region of 72m with 15m in add ons.

Allover the media yesterday and today that Liverpool are about to offer Lovren + Cash to Napoli for Koulibaly.

It does make sense to get another quality CB because there'll be enough games to keep everyone happy. Matip's injuries are a liability now and it's fairly certain Lovren will be on his way. Gomez has been very good paired with VVD but he has also been cover for LB/RB and there'll be enough games to rotate VVD Koulibaly and Gomez at CB.

The idea City are to get Koulibaly would be potentially tragic for us because it is their current achilles heel finding somebody to partner Laporte.

Although we surrendered tamely over Werner, so how could we possibly stump up 20m+ more for Koulibaly?



Cant see this happening as it is more expensive than the Werner deal and the player is already 29. Dont know why we are being linked that much

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
E
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds
Originally Posted By Pickles
Literally the day after City eventually surrender the title to us, they are negotiating a deal for Koulibaly said to be in the region of 72m with 15m in add ons.

Allover the media yesterday and today that Liverpool are about to offer Lovren + Cash to Napoli for Koulibaly.

It does make sense to get another quality CB because there'll be enough games to keep everyone happy. Matip's injuries are a liability now and it's fairly certain Lovren will be on his way. Gomez has been very good paired with VVD but he has also been cover for LB/RB and there'll be enough games to rotate VVD Koulibaly and Gomez at CB.

The idea City are to get Koulibaly would be potentially tragic for us because it is their current achilles heel finding somebody to partner Laporte.

Although we surrendered tamely over Werner, so how could we possibly stump up 20m+ more for Koulibaly?



Cant see this happening as it is more expensive than the Werner deal and the player is already 29. Dont know why we are being linked that much


I agree, can't see this happening, doesn't match FSG model as there is no sell on fee at 29, so we won't stump up £70+ million with no future sale. I also doubt Klopp would want to block Gomez development, as VvD & Koulibaly would be our CB pairing for next 5 years based on that price.

I cannot see City spending that sort of money until they know FFP appeal result, as it would not send out a good message to Uefa.

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 312
B
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
B Offline
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 312
I wonder would the rationale behind this signing be to move TAA into midfield and Gomez out to right back?

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
E
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
Originally Posted By BARTON42
I wonder would the rationale behind this signing be to move TAA into midfield and Gomez out to right back?


Gomez is an excellent CB, but we lose allot of attacking options with him at RB, if TAA went into MF, I would rather play Necco Williams who has looked really good, but is still young and inexperienced, or we buy a good attacking RB, I cannot see this happening for now, we are in more need of a LB to cover Robbo.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Originally Posted By BARTON42
I wonder would the rationale behind this signing be to move TAA into midfield and Gomez out to right back?


Gomez is an excellent CB, but we lose allot of attacking options with him at RB, if TAA went into MF, I would rather play Necco Williams who has looked really good, but is still young and inexperienced, or we buy a good attacking RB, I cannot see this happening for now, we are in more need of a LB to cover Robbo.


But no way we will buy Koulibaly

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
E
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Originally Posted By BARTON42
I wonder would the rationale behind this signing be to move TAA into midfield and Gomez out to right back?


Gomez is an excellent CB, but we lose allot of attacking options with him at RB, if TAA went into MF, I would rather play Necco Williams who has looked really good, but is still young and inexperienced, or we buy a good attacking RB, I cannot see this happening for now, we are in more need of a LB to cover Robbo.


But no way we will buy Koulibaly


I agree, if we have £70 million to spend, I can think of better places to spend it, like buy a quality forward or LB. I think Napoli/agent are trying to drive up the price, he has been linked with us, Utd & City, at his age I cannot see clubs paying huge money like Napoli want.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Originally Posted By BARTON42
I wonder would the rationale behind this signing be to move TAA into midfield and Gomez out to right back?


Gomez is an excellent CB, but we lose allot of attacking options with him at RB, if TAA went into MF, I would rather play Necco Williams who has looked really good, but is still young and inexperienced, or we buy a good attacking RB, I cannot see this happening for now, we are in more need of a LB to cover Robbo.


But no way we will buy Koulibaly


I agree, if we have £70 million to spend, I can think of better places to spend it, like buy a quality forward or LB. I think Napoli/agent are trying to drive up the price, he has been linked with us, Utd & City, at his age I cannot see clubs paying huge money like Napoli want.


70m? I will be surprised if Klopp gets half of that to spend unless we sell. I read recently the chairman saying FSG didnt take a pound in dividends from the club but forgot to say that FSG didnt inject any capital neither and are ploughing back the loans they have given.

Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
E
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds


But no way we will buy Koulibaly


I agree, if we have £70 million to spend, I can think of better places to spend it, like buy a quality forward or LB. I think Napoli/agent are trying to drive up the price, he has been linked with us, Utd & City, at his age I cannot see clubs paying huge money like Napoli want.


70m? I will be surprised if Klopp gets half of that to spend unless we sell. I read recently the chairman saying FSG didnt take a pound in dividends from the club but forgot to say that FSG didnt inject any capital neither and are ploughing back the loans they have given.


£70 million is the price being quoted for Koulibaly.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds
Originally Posted By ecnirp98
Originally Posted By EnergisedReds


But no way we will buy Koulibaly


I agree, if we have £70 million to spend, I can think of better places to spend it, like buy a quality forward or LB. I think Napoli/agent are trying to drive up the price, he has been linked with us, Utd & City, at his age I cannot see clubs paying huge money like Napoli want.


70m? I will be surprised if Klopp gets half of that to spend unless we sell. I read recently the chairman saying FSG didnt take a pound in dividends from the club but forgot to say that FSG didnt inject any capital neither and are ploughing back the loans they have given.


£70 million is the price being quoted for Koulibaly.


This is why I cant see us buying him

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion