|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 5,936
1st Team Squad
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 5,936 |
Mendy had Stockholm syndrome influenced by where his wage packet comes from!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343 |
Youre saying a black man was offended by Silvas tweet,but pretended not
to be because he is getting paid a lot.
So is he dishonest for saying he wasnt offended?
Theres no way of knowing this,so if you answered yes then that would be
considered .......
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,746
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,746 |
Doesn’t matter. Casual racism is still racism and should be treated accordingly. Well he got one match ban and a fine, what else do you want for a mistake that can be perceived as racism, though Mendy didn't think it was? In Suarez's case, Evra said it was racist, big difference. Didn't Evra have a run in with Chelsea groundsmen over racist comments? The same Evra that jumped into his own fans led kick off to fight with them? Suarez got done by a well oiled machine. Evra always has been a w@nker and I cannot believe Sky giving him airtime as a pundit recently. He is scum.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
Doesn’t matter. Casual racism is still racism and should be treated accordingly. Well he got one match ban and a fine, what else do you want for a mistake that can be perceived as racism, though Mendy didn't think it was? In Suarez's case, Evra said it was racist, big difference. Didn't Evra have a run in with Chelsea groundsmen over racist comments? The same Evra that jumped into his own fans led kick off to fight with them? Suarez got done by a well oiled machine. Evra always has been a w@nker and I cannot believe Sky giving him airtime as a pundit recently. He is scum. Not sure the relevancy of your posts, are you trying to say Evra lied and should not have been believed by the FA hearing committee? I don't understand why they wouldn't do a hearing and let's be honest, we all know Suarez would do anything to win a game, he is as much a cheater you will get in the game.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
Doesn’t matter. Casual racism is still racism and should be treated accordingly. Well he got one match ban and a fine, what else do you want for a mistake that can be perceived as racism, though Mendy didn't think it was? In Suarez's case, Evra said it was racist, big difference. Consistency in punishments wouldn’t be bad would it? This now give anyone the excuse to say it was ‘banter’. If we’re serious about ‘kicking it out’, zero tolerance is needed.
Last edited by wilkij1975; 15/11/19 07:31 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
Doesn’t matter. Casual racism is still racism and should be treated accordingly. Well he got one match ban and a fine, what else do you want for a mistake that can be perceived as racism, though Mendy didn't think it was? In Suarez's case, Evra said it was racist, big difference. Didn't Evra have a run in with Chelsea groundsmen over racist comments? The same Evra that jumped into his own fans led kick off to fight with them? Suarez got done by a well oiled machine. Evra always has been a w@nker and I cannot believe Sky giving him airtime as a pundit recently. He is scum. And let’s not forget this was one mans word against another’s. No one else on the pitch heard or saw what was said. And where was John Terrys punishment which was a lot more than one mans word against another?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
Doesn’t matter. Casual racism is still racism and should be treated accordingly. Well he got one match ban and a fine, what else do you want for a mistake that can be perceived as racism, though Mendy didn't think it was? In Suarez's case, Evra said it was racist, big difference. Consistency in punishments wouldn’t be bad would it? This now give anyone the excuse to say it was ‘banter’. If we’re serious about ‘kicking it out’, zero tolerance is needed. Consistency on what? The incidents were completely different. Are you saying all crimes need to have the same sentence?
Last edited by EnergisedReds; 15/11/19 01:49 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343 |
No way you can get consistency from the FA anyway.
Look at the legitimate goal of Firminos against Villa.
The FA covered up the VAR decision by changing the laws of geometry.
They decided to present a lie to the public and everybody knowing it was
a lie.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
No way you can get consistency from the FA anyway.
Look at the legitimate goal of Firminos against Villa.
The FA covered up the VAR decision by changing the laws of geometry.
They decided to present a lie to the public and everybody knowing it was
a lie. So according to you, while the VAR ref was checking the offside decision, the president or I don't know who, phoned to the ref and told him to make it offside? I could agree that there might not be consistency because it's not the same ref checking all the time and there is an element of interpretation involved, but to think it's all planned and the whole world including the FA is against Liverpool is stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 343 |
The justification later in the day is what Im referring to.
Changing the laws of geometry to suit a fake explanation?
You have to question their sanity in presenting this to a very informed public.
As for your personal grudge against Suarez - not what you expect from a Red.
|
|
|
|
|
