|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
It's not Klopp who decides, Klopp like all our managers submits a wishlist which FSG say yes or no to, which then goes to our recruitment team.
You couldn’t be more wrong if you tried.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,661
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,661 |
We still have a transfer committee, if you believe Klopp is in sole charge of transfers you are mistaken.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,661
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,060
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,060 |
How are they meaningless? I'm trying to get attention to the fact that we have owners who are not in my opinion the best for our club?
Did you notice that JWH dashed over to London last week to watch the Red Sox in a pointless game yet can't be bothered to watch many of our games?
Is it not better to draw attention to my fears that FSG will not spend any substantial money this window instead of moaning after the window closes?
If we sign Mbappe, Coutinho, or Dembelle, hell even Pepe I will take it back, doesn't look very likely though does it.
I believe that they think the job is done, we dont need to invest, Spurs didn't last summer and got to the CL final etc.
My fear is we do that and it's back to competing for 4th again.
We need new players, I just think that the appetite does not exist with our owners. The issue isn’t that you want to discuss whether they’re good owners or not. If that’s your opinion then fine. The issue is that you’ve started 5-6 threads in the last couple of days just to state the same idea in a slightly different way, that’s what annoys people. Make a thread to discuss it by all means, but we don’t need more than 1 for the same thing!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
We still have a transfer committee, if you believe Klopp is in sole charge of transfers you are mistaken. No manager is solely in charge of transfers. But it doesn’t work like with Rodgers and again, if you think it does, you’re just wrong. The last few seasons have shown that Klopp will buy who he wants and when he wants. FSG have backed him. You can say it’s with money from sales and no doubt you will. Probably in the same breath as saying they sell players to pocket the money 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
How are they meaningless? I'm trying to get attention to the fact that we have owners who are not in my opinion the best for our club?
Did you notice that JWH dashed over to London last week to watch the Red Sox in a pointless game yet can't be bothered to watch many of our games?
Is it not better to draw attention to my fears that FSG will not spend any substantial money this window instead of moaning after the window closes?
If we sign Mbappe, Coutinho, or Dembelle, hell even Pepe I will take it back, doesn't look very likely though does it.
I believe that they think the job is done, we dont need to invest, Spurs didn't last summer and got to the CL final etc.
My fear is we do that and it's back to competing for 4th again.
We need new players, I just think that the appetite does not exist with our owners. The issue isn’t that you want to discuss whether they’re good owners or not. If that’s your opinion then fine. The issue is that you’ve started 5-6 threads in the last couple of days just to state the same idea in a slightly different way, that’s what annoys people. Make a thread to discuss it by all means, but we don’t need more than 1 for the same thing! Here here.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,661
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,661 |
We still have a transfer committee, if you believe Klopp is in sole charge of transfers you are mistaken. No manager is solely in charge of transfers. But it doesn’t work like with Rodgers and again, if you think it does, you’re just wrong. The last few seasons have shown that Klopp will buy who he wants and when he wants. FSG have backed him. You can say it’s with money from sales and no doubt you will. Probably in the same breath as saying they sell players to pocket the money And where are your facts that the transfer committee works differently with Klopp than it did with BR. I eagerly await for you to publish the facts that you made this sweeping statement from. Over to you.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
Where are your facts that it does? I don’t eagerly await your response as it will be nonsense like just about everything ‘cough’ Cech ‘cough’ Lavezzi that you post.
Take a look at who we’ve signed recently. Fact enough for me. Players that fit the managers mentality and the way he plays.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054 |
We still have a transfer committee, if you believe Klopp is in sole charge of transfers you are mistaken. No manager is solely in charge of transfers. But it doesn’t work like with Rodgers and again, if you think it does, you’re just wrong. The last few seasons have shown that Klopp will buy who he wants and when he wants. FSG have backed him. You can say it’s with money from sales and no doubt you will. Probably in the same breath as saying they sell players to pocket the money And where are your facts that the transfer committee works differently with Klopp than it did with BR. I eagerly await for you to publish the facts that you made this sweeping statement from. Over to you. The answer is no one on here knows 100%, it has been stated by lots of Liverpool reporters who are in the know that Klopp has the final say on who comes in/leaves, there is a team, call them a committee if you want who identify players, with all the metrics available today, player recruitment is a science. It has been openly stated that Klopp did not initially fancy Salah, that he had to be convinced to sign him, which they did, but if he had not been convinced, we would not have signed him. To attract Klopp for the job, I am sure FSG would have agreed pretty much anything Klopp wanted in the running of the club, he was a high profile manager in demand and we were a struggling club trying to attract him. Brendan Rodgers did not have the background or experience of Klopp, he took the job on FSG terms as he was just happy to get a top job. The clearest example of BR not being in charge of transfers was when he went infront of the worlds press and laughed off signing Balotelli like it was a big joke, then 3 weeks later we signed him, he was not a BR signing in any shape or form and BR stated that before we bought him. I cannot see that happening with Klopp.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 81
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 81 |
Ah here! Come on Dunc.. no nuts are you going to suggest that this is another reasonable thread asking fair questions of FSG or are you going to grow a pair and stand up against this ridiculous anti FSG behavior ? At what point do you accept we are in good hands and let our beloved club get on with sending us in the right direction?
|
|
|
|
|
