KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 41 of 51 1 2 … 39 40 41 42 43 … 50 51
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926


Unless injured I am sure he will be on the first team as well as Keita and probably Fabinho.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
V
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
V Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
Depends on whether we sign any more players and if so who they are, doesn't it?

If we for example got Fekir, I'd be doubtful regarding Hendo's place in the starting XI.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By van Gogh
Depends on whether we sign any more players and if so who they are, doesn't it?

If we for example got Fekir, I'd be doubtful regarding Hendo's place in the starting XI.


Kefir doesn't play in the same position as Henderson, he is a number 10 or winger. So he was never going to replace Henderson. Fabinho can and even Keita.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
V
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
V Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
Where did I say that then?

Of course he would not play as a DM.

Fekir would play as a N:o 10, and Keita would drop back.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By van Gogh
Where did I say that then?

Of course he would not play as a DM.

Fekir would play as a N:o 10, and Keita would drop back.


Then we would be conceding even more than what we did. Keita is more offensive than Henderson. It might work against the weaker teams but we would be less balanced. Fekir was being bought as an AM and we bought Shaqiri instead to rotate with the 2 or 3 AM, not with Henderson

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,930
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,930
are we still seeing Fekir as a likely signing then?

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 8,564
Looks dead at this point.

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,077
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,077
Originally Posted By kernowred
are we still seeing Fekir as a likely signing then?


I think we are waiting to see what's happening with Pulisic

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
V
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
V Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
Originally Posted By TiredReds
Originally Posted By van Gogh
Where did I say that then?

Of course he would not play as a DM.

Fekir would play as a N:o 10, and Keita would drop back.


Then we would be conceding even more than what we did. Keita is more offensive than Henderson. It might work against the weaker teams but we would be less balanced. Fekir was being bought as an AM and we bought Shaqiri instead to rotate with the 2 or 3 AM, not with Henderson


Henderson's natural position isn't as a DM. In Sunderland he used to play as a right mid. He has learned over time to be more defensive than what he used to be. He is really more of a box to box midfielder.

Keita is a player that is as versatile as they come. He can break up play and also be quite offensive.

Klopp doesn't really want to play with specialist players. He wants them to be able to rotate and interchange.

Hence it would make sense to play with for example Fekir instead of Henderson, simply because he would make the starting XI better than what it would be without him, and with Henderson in it. Keita would drop back and be more defensive orientated while Fekir would play as a N:o 10 just behind the front 3.

Whether it will ever happen I don't know, but that is another question.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By van Gogh
Originally Posted By TiredReds
Originally Posted By van Gogh
Where did I say that then?

Of course he would not play as a DM.

Fekir would play as a N:o 10, and Keita would drop back.


Then we would be conceding even more than what we did. Keita is more offensive than Henderson. It might work against the weaker teams but we would be less balanced. Fekir was being bought as an AM and we bought Shaqiri instead to rotate with the 2 or 3 AM, not with Henderson


Henderson's natural position isn't as a DM. In Sunderland he used to play as a right mid. He has learned over time to be more defensive than what he used to be. He is really more of a box to box midfielder.

Keita is a player that is as versatile as they come. He can break up play and also be quite offensive.

Klopp doesn't really want to play with specialist players. He wants them to be able to rotate and interchange.

Hence it would make sense to play with for example Fekir instead of Henderson, simply because he would make the starting XI better than what it would be without him, and with Henderson in it. Keita would drop back and be more defensive orientated while Fekir would play as a N:o 10 just behind the front 3.

Whether it will ever happen I don't know, but that is another question.


IMO if we bought Fekir, Hendo wouldn't have been moved to the bench for the 1st team, maybe in some games if we wanted to be very offensive. Hendo might have started in a more offensive player but he is much more defensive now for both club and country. Fekir was being bought to rotate with our attacking midfielders but we bought Shaqiri instead.

Page 41 of 51 1 2 … 39 40 41 42 43 … 50 51

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion