KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
L
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
L Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Lost in translation

Klopp or FSG who's fault is it?

___________________
Klopp can move on to an alternative CB.

Or

Klopp goes for VvD " only"

_______________

Will southampton refuse to do business with LFC ... or is their a price ?


__________
What is that price you think southampton cannot refuse from LFC ?

Should we pay it if Klopp has no alternatives ?

Or

should we get upset with Klopp for not having alternatives?


Last edited by LFCDownUnder; 11/08/17 08:18 AM.

It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
E
EMP Offline
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
E Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
obvious klopp gave his word to vvd

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
L
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
L Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Originally Posted By EMP
obvious klopp gave his word to vvd


How much money does "Klopps word" translate to in an offer for VvD?
And if Klopp was in-charge of: how much to offer, how much you think he would offer so'ton?

Last edited by LFCDownUnder; 11/08/17 08:29 AM.

It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By EMP
obvious klopp gave his word to vvd


How much money does "Klopps word" translate to in an offer for VvD?
And if Klopp was in-charge of: how much to offer, how much you think he would offer so'ton?


We could offer 50m or 40m+Sakho. If they do not accept we go for an alternative

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
L
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
L Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Originally Posted By RedsforChampions
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By EMP
obvious klopp gave his word to vvd


How much money does "Klopps word" translate to in an offer for VvD?
And if Klopp was in-charge of: how much to offer, how much you think he would offer so'ton?


We could offer 50m or 40m+Sakho. If they do not accept we go for an alternative



If so , then Why did we reject southamptons loan offer for sakho in January?


It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By RedsforChampions
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By EMP
obvious klopp gave his word to vvd


How much money does "Klopps word" translate to in an offer for VvD?
And if Klopp was in-charge of: how much to offer, how much you think he would offer so'ton?


We could offer 50m or 40m+Sakho. If they do not accept we go for an alternative



If so , then Why did we reject southamptons loan offer for sakho in January?


Maybe because Crystal Palace offered a better loan deal. The question should rather be, why didn't we try to make the VVD deal in Jan when they wanted Sakho?

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
L
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
L Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Good question , I'd have imagined given such an interest we have in VvD that Klopp would have told LFC to consider a possible deal for VvD in January with sakho, so I'm confused also


It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
It was a fukk up by the club as a whole as to why we didn't sign him earlier in the window. Klopp is to blame for not having an alternative.

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
H Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
Originally Posted By EMP
obvious klopp gave his word to vvd

That thought has struck me too EMP, and it looks as though both him and VvD are men of their word. What we now need is for FSG to back both of them and get this deal over the line. The additional cost incurred is because of the pr press release which is under FSGs remit so they should shoulder the financial pain of their own blundering. LFC fans should also be loud and clear in their support for both Klopp and VvD and not allow FSG off this hook of their own making.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By Hercules/AF 58
Originally Posted By EMP
obvious klopp gave his word to vvd

That thought has struck me too EMP, and it looks as though both him and VvD are men of their word. What we now need is for FSG to back both of them and get this deal over the line. The additional cost incurred is because of the pr press release which is under FSGs remit so they should shoulder the financial pain of their own blundering. LFC fans should also be loud and clear in their support for both Klopp and VvD and not allow FSG off this hook of their own making.


How is the press under FSG remit and not Klopp, it's either both or none, total bullocks again and if ever you haven't read what their manager said, Southampton want to keep their player.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion