|
|
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404 |
I hear that statement was sanctioned without the knowledge of Klopp, if that's true then that is really sad and disorganised considering how pivotal it is
It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291 |
VvD has been up for sale. We were told not to talk to him until the season was over. We did not and know what happened next.
So Southampton do not want to do business with us. There are hoping they can sell to city or chelsea instead of us. So this one is going to go down to the wire. I am 100% sure though we will see a bid from chelsea if Southampton actually do not agree to sell to us. He won't be a southampton player by the 1st of sept I am sure of that. He is up for sale and will be sold
Van Dijk wasn't up for sale at the start of the transfer window. He signed a new 6 year contract at Southampton last season so if they refuse to sell him, which they are within their rights to do, it's his own fault. Don't sign a new contract if you want to leave less than 12 months later!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
VvD has been up for sale. We were told not to talk to him until the season was over. We did not and know what happened next.
So Southampton do not want to do business with us. There are hoping they can sell to city or chelsea instead of us. So this one is going to go down to the wire. I am 100% sure though we will see a bid from chelsea if Southampton actually do not agree to sell to us. He won't be a southampton player by the 1st of sept I am sure of that. He is up for sale and will be sold
Van Dijk wasn't up for sale at the start of the transfer window. He signed a new 6 year contract at Southampton last season so if they refuse to sell him, which they are within their rights to do, it's his own fault. Don't sign a new contract if you want to leave less than 12 months later! The problem is not we can buy him or not but we have no other options which can improve the defence
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,946
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,946 |
VvD has been up for sale. We were told not to talk to him until the season was over. We did not and know what happened next.
So Southampton do not want to do business with us. There are hoping they can sell to city or chelsea instead of us. So this one is going to go down to the wire. I am 100% sure though we will see a bid from chelsea if Southampton actually do not agree to sell to us. He won't be a southampton player by the 1st of sept I am sure of that. He is up for sale and will be sold
Van Dijk wasn't up for sale at the start of the transfer window. He signed a new 6 year contract at Southampton last season so if they refuse to sell him, which they are within their rights to do, it's his own fault. Don't sign a new contract if you want to leave less than 12 months later! I guarantee you once, ourselves, city and chelsea came in then he was up for sale. He will be sold this summer
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,054 |
VvD has been up for sale. We were told not to talk to him until the season was over. We did not and know what happened next.
So Southampton do not want to do business with us. There are hoping they can sell to city or chelsea instead of us. So this one is going to go down to the wire. I am 100% sure though we will see a bid from chelsea if Southampton actually do not agree to sell to us. He won't be a southampton player by the 1st of sept I am sure of that. He is up for sale and will be sold
Van Dijk wasn't up for sale at the start of the transfer window. He signed a new 6 year contract at Southampton last season so if they refuse to sell him, which they are within their rights to do, it's his own fault. Don't sign a new contract if you want to leave less than 12 months later! I guarantee you once, ourselves, city and chelsea came in then he was up for sale. He will be sold this summer The big thing that p*ssed Southampton off was that it was leaked (by us apparently) that VvD was only interested in joining Liverpool, which meant their expected bidding war between us Us/City/Utd/Chelsea was not going to happen, so they knew FSG would try and low ball a buy saying no one else will sign him. We then panicked at being reported for a dodgy approach as we already have a final warning over us for a youth transfer, so we could have ended up getting a transfer ban. So I can see why the suits panicked and quickly issued an apology to stop any escalation, it looked bad, but prevented a transfer ban, if we hadn't done that and got a further ban, imagine what would have been said on here !!! In fact, allot on here would have been saying FSG manufactured the ban to prevent transfers and outlay (surely their dream scenario based on what allot think of FSG on here!!!!).
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291 |
VvD has been up for sale. We were told not to talk to him until the season was over. We did not and know what happened next.
So Southampton do not want to do business with us. There are hoping they can sell to city or chelsea instead of us. So this one is going to go down to the wire. I am 100% sure though we will see a bid from chelsea if Southampton actually do not agree to sell to us. He won't be a southampton player by the 1st of sept I am sure of that. He is up for sale and will be sold
Van Dijk wasn't up for sale at the start of the transfer window. He signed a new 6 year contract at Southampton last season so if they refuse to sell him, which they are within their rights to do, it's his own fault. Don't sign a new contract if you want to leave less than 12 months later! I guarantee you once, ourselves, city and chelsea came in then he was up for sale. He will be sold this summer Just because he may leave doesn't mean Southampton are actively looking to sell which is what 'up for sale' means. If he does go it will be because he has forced the transfer, nothing to do with Southampton wanting rid.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404 |
If LFC offer £60m for Virgil we won't get
If we offer £75 with £40 upfront , we won't get
If we offer £75 upfront "maybe" in consideration
-offer £90m we have good chance and restore some respect from LFC fans
We have gone through all this trouble to get Virgil ,we have no back-up plan, we were meant to have a warchest , give me one reason why offering £90m isn't justified?
It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084 |
VvD has been up for sale. We were told not to talk to him until the season was over. We did not and know what happened next.
So Southampton do not want to do business with us. There are hoping they can sell to city or chelsea instead of us. So this one is going to go down to the wire. I am 100% sure though we will see a bid from chelsea if Southampton actually do not agree to sell to us. He won't be a southampton player by the 1st of sept I am sure of that. He is up for sale and will be sold
Van Dijk wasn't up for sale at the start of the transfer window. He signed a new 6 year contract at Southampton last season so if they refuse to sell him, which they are within their rights to do, it's his own fault. Don't sign a new contract if you want to leave less than 12 months later! I guarantee you once, ourselves, city and chelsea came in then he was up for sale. He will be sold this summer The big thing that p*ssed Southampton off was that it was leaked (by us apparently) that VvD was only interested in joining Liverpool, which meant their expected bidding war between us Us/City/Utd/Chelsea was not going to happen, so they knew FSG would try and low ball a buy saying no one else will sign him. We then panicked at being reported for a dodgy approach as we already have a final warning over us for a youth transfer, so we could have ended up getting a transfer ban. So I can see why the suits panicked and quickly issued an apology to stop any escalation, it looked bad, but prevented a transfer ban, if we hadn't done that and got a further ban, imagine what would have been said on here !!! In fact, allot on here would have been saying FSG manufactured the ban to prevent transfers and outlay (surely their dream scenario based on what allot think of FSG on here!!!!). They have no reason to incur a transfer ban when they can get away with uninspiring transfer windows year in year out.
That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
I don't know when we got interested in VVD, was it when he was injured? Why didn't we try in Jan before he signed a new contract? How was he not value then, now he is after having been injured for months? There are a lot of morons in the club management including Klopp
Last edited by RedsforChampions; 07/08/17 05:21 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291 |
We have gone through all this trouble to get Virgil ,we have no back-up plan, we were meant to have a warchest , give me one reason why offering £90m isn't justified?
The most expensive defenders ever are Kyle Walker and Benjamin Mendy at Man City, both signed this Summer for around £50million each. You want to spend nearly double that on Van Dijk when Leonardo Bonucci, probably the best central defender in the world went for around £35million. Anyway, Van Dijk has handed in a transfer request but I still think Southampton would prefer to sell to anyone but us!
|
|
|
|
|
