KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By Chris2402
Originally Posted By Redneckscouser


FSG have also made the club look really bad at times with their decisions...
Only banning The S*n newspaper and it's Journalists from Liverpool FC and it's grounds in Feb this year! after the families of the fallen of Hillsborough had repeatedly requested in the years prior for them to ban it. Only when criminal proceedings had started did FSG decide to do anything!



Hillsborough occurred on the 15th of April 1989, FSG purchased Liverpool in October 2010. Yet it's solely their fault that The S** wasn't banned before, nothing to do with Moores or Hicks and Gillett, the previous owners going back until 1991?



Redneckscouser makes some very interesting points , points that I share, with all due respect to him, I'm not in agreement with the blaming FSG for delaying banning the S*n , but still doesn't make all the other comments less valid, not everyone has to be in agreement , every fan Whether FSG in/out/pending-verdict
Will have disagreements , but do not put down someone for having a disdain for FSG , especially considering that such disdain is on extremely reasonable grounds.

I'm sure most of us here are FSGout to a degree maybe not completely , but in the meantime let's try not to disregard a persons complete view on FSG based on disagreeing with a couple opinions


I think you and him should chat with each other, most here are not bothered by your repeated FSG threads

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
C
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
C Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,291
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By Chris2402
Originally Posted By Redneckscouser


FSG have also made the club look really bad at times with their decisions...
Only banning The S*n newspaper and it's Journalists from Liverpool FC and it's grounds in Feb this year! after the families of the fallen of Hillsborough had repeatedly requested in the years prior for them to ban it. Only when criminal proceedings had started did FSG decide to do anything!



Hillsborough occurred on the 15th of April 1989, FSG purchased Liverpool in October 2010. Yet it's solely their fault that The S** wasn't banned before, nothing to do with Moores or Hicks and Gillett, the previous owners going back until 1991?



Redneckscouser makes some very interesting points , points that I share, with all due respect to him, I'm not in agreement with the blaming FSG for delaying banning the S*n , but still doesn't make all the other comments less valid, not everyone has to be in agreement , every fan Whether FSG in/out/pending-verdict
Will have disagreements , but do not put down someone for having a disdain for FSG , especially considering that such disdain is on extremely reasonable grounds.

I'm sure most of us here are FSGout to a degree maybe not completely , but in the meantime let's try not to disregard a persons complete view on FSG based on disagreeing with a couple opinions


If you read my post I don't disregard his opinion at all, I question why it's FSG's fault that The S** hasn't been banned from Liverpool when we had two owners for 21 years after the event who did nothing yet it's FSG's fault who didn't take control until 2010?

However despite my reasonable questioning there isn't a response? Why's that?

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
L
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
L Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 404
Originally Posted By Chris2402
Originally Posted By LFCDownUnder
Originally Posted By Chris2402
Originally Posted By Redneckscouser


FSG have also made the club look really bad at times with their decisions...
Only banning The S*n newspaper and it's Journalists from Liverpool FC and it's grounds in Feb this year! after the families of the fallen of Hillsborough had repeatedly requested in the years prior for them to ban it. Only when criminal proceedings had started did FSG decide to do anything!



Hillsborough occurred on the 15th of April 1989, FSG purchased Liverpool in October 2010. Yet it's solely their fault that The S** wasn't banned before, nothing to do with Moores or Hicks and Gillett, the previous owners going back until 1991?



Redneckscouser makes some very interesting points , points that I share, with all due respect to him, I'm not in agreement with the blaming FSG for delaying banning the S*n , but still doesn't make all the other comments less valid, not everyone has to be in agreement , every fan Whether FSG in/out/pending-verdict
Will have disagreements , but do not put down someone for having a disdain for FSG , especially considering that such disdain is on extremely reasonable grounds.

I'm sure most of us here are FSGout to a degree maybe not completely , but in the meantime let's try not to disregard a persons complete view on FSG based on disagreeing with a couple opinions


If you read my post I don't disregard his opinion at all, I question why it's FSG's fault that The S** hasn't been banned from Liverpool when we had two owners for 21 years after the event who did nothing yet it's FSG's fault who didn't take control until 2010?

However despite my reasonable questioning there isn't a response? Why's that?


Theirs a time difference I only noticed now , ye all good it wasn't aimed at you specifically , if it was I would've put the "@" sign , my fault as I quoted your comment so my bad

It's just people in General give redneckscouser lots of grief that I don't believe is warranted

Last edited by LFCDownUnder; 25/07/17 01:08 AM.

It is about pushing the train, not jumping on a running train.’ That is what we need here. It’s not allowed to take the history in the backpack
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion