I don't really understand the Klavan signing at all, why would we give a 'long term contract' to a 30 year old with no experience of playing in the Premiership? Also if we have signed him as cover, do we not have any youngsters who can be back up instead?
I'm not criticising the player as I don't know much about him but I don't understand signing a 30 year old as back up on a long-term contract, makes absolutely no sense to me!
why Chris!
were in trouble signing defenders and players in general we cant attract younger T/C ones due to CL so a stop gap for us but has to go two ways so he says ok but i want a long term deal ! deal done
i think we wouldnt give skirts a L/T deal or even a year it was paid if you play! skirts is younger by a yr i think? till he said get furkeded and rightly so imo, so to me this says the sort of summer and year were looking at stop gap signings out of contract and low priced players 25 mil or less in the majority of cases, fsg have said imo get us into CL and we will go the full hog that summer thats my opinion anyway