KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum David Moores’s letter to The Times in full

"Several things happened (or didn’t happen) that gave cause for concern. Our being made aware that DIC had devised a 7-year exit strategy was one such issue, along with a suggestion they intended to raise £300 million in working capital (i.e debt), secured against the club........ Gillett and Hicks produced a very substantial offer document containing all the key assurances re debt, ... "

One offer contained debt and so did the other. So, the difference was ... ?
If you don't know all the facts in a situation, you just have to look very carefully at what someone says, and if there is one inconsistency in it, then in all likelihood the whole lot is bollox.

Why leave it now to come out with this letter and not sooner?
Regardless of his mistakes he was probably doing what he thought was right at the time.
We have to stand united in all of this in support of our beloved club and voice our thoughts to Hicks & Gillet.
YNWA

The only thing he did that he thought was right was line his pocket the greedy f***ing c**t.

there's some pathetic excuses in this letter. the harm is already done and it's because moores and parry are two incompetent c*nts.

seriously, i doubt they did any research at all before selling. and that "google" part of the letter was pathetic.

The only thing I'm try to figure out from this letter is why now?
after all these years.

we've been calling for the club to be sold for ages and he comes out now? Could there be an offer on the table from a very reliable owner that hasn't been accepted?

And another point is if he's that concerned about the future of the club with the idiots he sold it to then why doesnt he get his hand in his pocket and get a consortium together to by the club back.

That would be a step backwards wouldn't it?

it will be a case of us settling for the lesser of two evils.

How can we go back compared with what we've got now?

Sorry, meant to say a step in the wrong direction. i.e. not forward.

my only concern at the moment with reagrd to new owners is that it will more than likely be a consortium. We don't need to sit with another batch of owners that don't see eye to eye.

As a short term answer I'd take it just to get the club off the hands of two mercenaries who are just interesting in making the most money they possibly can at the expense of the future of Liverpool FC.