Would be interesting to hear what posters would say regarding the bite and Suarez behaviour if he wasn't such a good player, would he still be defended so vigourously if he was say...Smicer, Cisse or Kuyt...think not. I bet if El Hadj Diouf was as good a player for us as Suarez he would be backed too, just so laughable the inconsistency...
If you read (if you can that is) no one is defending what he did.
i disagree completely, nobody would of got away with the stuff he did if he wasn't such a good player for us, it's a clear one law for one, one for another, the bottom line is that allowances were made for him simply because he was such an important asset to the business.
Lesser player would of been bounced out of the Club and I would go as far as to say the Club would of looked to of sued him because he probably had no racially abusing or racially assaulting and physical biting as part of his contract of not doing that stuff which he signed...