|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,849
Under 23 Player
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,849 |
But you weren't registered on Koptalk when Sterling left so how would you have any idea what other posters said about Ibe supposedly being better?
As for keeping to the topic I do, I don't bang the same drum on every topic saying give up on the league, we have no chance against Man City in a cup final and the club has no local identity, that is all you.
For the record I laughed at those who said Ibe is better than Sterling, he isn't even close. Hopefully that will change in the future but I can't see it.
Neither can I, Ibe won't be in the number ten role because we have 3 better players currently to occupy that position, nor will he be given the chance to be a main player sterling was, part of an SSS. He should look to better his career elsewhere, but he will find it hard, until he improves other aspects of his game he won't prove himself, to reach the position sterling has elevated himself into.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,813
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,813 |
he is nowhere near the player Sterling is so I think a lot of people saying he was have got that part wrong... No he isn't but who was saying he was? Quite a few people on KT were saying he was better than Sterling; probably only because they had their knickers up their fannies about raheem wanting to leave. Now that the dust has settled (and the knickers are back in position), anyone can see that Ibe is nowhere near as good....which is probably why City didn't offer £50m for him instead! I only remember people saying he could be better not that he is. And Sterling is hardly pulling up trees is he? 9 goals already this season including 3 in the champions league. I would say he's doing very well indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,849
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,849 |
9 goals already this season including 3 in the champions league. I would say he's doing very well indeed.
If he scored 9 goals for liverpool with only 15 games remaining in the league, would you still say he's done very well?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
9 goals already this season including 3 in the champions league. I would say he's doing very well indeed.
If we'd paid £50m for that you'd be fukking livid and rightly so as most of us would.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,849
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,849 |
9 goals already this season including 3 in the champions league. I would say he's doing very well indeed.
If we'd paid £50m for that you'd be fukking livid and rightly so as most of us would. It's not been a high scoring league overall to be fair. Look at the goal difference of all the teams, especially in the top four this season, it's unbelievably low/poor. (various reasons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spangles
Unregistered
|
|
Spangles
Unregistered
|
9 goals already this season including 3 in the champions league. I would say he's doing very well indeed.
If we'd paid £50m for that you'd be fukking livid and rightly so as most of us would. depends what the net spent was according to some...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
9 goals already this season including 3 in the champions league. I would say he's doing very well indeed.
If we'd paid £50m for that you'd be fukking livid and rightly so as most of us would. depends what the net spent was according to some... No. Just spending £50m on a player like Sterling is bonkers. He's a good player and had he not been a little cvnt, I'd have liked him to stay. But we mugged City there no two ways about it. And can you stick to the TOPIC. This is about Ibe not net spend 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,813
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,813 |
9 goals already this season including 3 in the champions league. I would say he's doing very well indeed.
If he scored 9 goals for liverpool with only 15 games remaining in the league, would you still say he's done very well? Yes I would, considering he's a winger. His goals:game ratio has more than doubled since he has was at Liverpool so he's clearly improving far quicker than anyone could have hoped. With the new TV money coming in, player values will simply double. City bought at him at just the right time. He's still a tvvat though.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,849
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,849 |
I agree considering he's a winger it's a very respectable return, (he hasn't got many assists mind, considerably less than when he was at liverpool) but I don't think he has improved that much to justify his 50 million price tag.
I don't think players value doubles though since the tv deal, so he's worth 100 million?
Last edited by Torres65; 01/02/16 01:52 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
9 goals already this season including 3 in the champions league. I would say he's doing very well indeed.
If he scored 9 goals for liverpool with only 15 games remaining in the league, would you still say he's done very well? Yes I would, considering he's a winger. His goals:game ratio has more than doubled since he has was at Liverpool so he's clearly improving far quicker than anyone could have hoped. With the new TV money coming in, player values will simply double. City bought at him at just the right time. He's still a tvvat though. I don't think he is worth 100m even with tv money. Yes, he is scoring more at City but they have a better team, I don’t think he has improved much when compared to the season we came 2nd. Yes, he is playing better than last season, as he is not a centre forward as he was made to be, by Rodgers
|
|
|
|
|
