The fact that people don't agree with me is fine. It is quite usual for people to have split opinions on players. But my opinion of Sakho's performance is shared by others so if you call me deluded (like people on here have done in the past when I have done player ratings) you are calling a lot of other people deluded as well.
The fact that people don't agree with me is fine. It is quite usual for people to have split opinions on players. But my opinion of Sakho's performance is shared by others so if you call me deluded (like people on here have done in the past when I have done player ratings) you are calling a lot of other people deluded as well.
Thank You.
I get the impression that some papers base their view on a highlights package so i'm not sure that its useful to back up your own views with their opinion...its also a bit weird that you'd want to start a new thread on it because people disagree with your ratings.
Personally i think your ratings are skewed and not based on watching the full game. With regards to Sakho, most of the team played badly so the defence was exposed and he more than anyone made clearances despite looking his gangly clumsy self. If he'd played 5/10 we'd never have got to pens! Besides, he was up against Crouch, he's bound to lose a few headers!
So let me get this straight, you pluck one player from 13 or so who participate in most games and find a journalist who happens to have given him around the same you did, as justification for your clueless player ratings of which you have more or less been posting since the season began.
On a serious point, Sakho looked well beat more than once last night and I'm a little concerned that his pace was well down. Always thought he was pretty quick, hopefully his injury hasn't robbed him of it and it's him not being back to full match fitness. Anyone else notice this?
Last edited by Top4; 27/01/1602:43 AM.
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.
