That's a cop out kop that's no explanation. Whatever you or I think look at the basic facts. Britain was one of the poorest countries in Europe when she took over one of the richest when she left when she took over we were under threat of nuclear anhiliation when she left we were not and the old Soviet Union disbanded. She win three elections on the bounce and only failed because she fell out of favour with the Tories not the people the Tories were in power for two decades I could go on but do you think the British people would vote her and a party in for TWO DECADES if they were no good.?
I understand Maggie thatcher arouses passions for and against but you can't argue with that
Can't argue..not only will I argue I will point out that every point u make is wrong. First off, British GDP stayed the same under her reign ,little bit up then back down again but more or less the same- all she did was take the money out of the public labour force and put it in elite coffers. She also had insane high unemployment throughout her reign- how is this a benefit to the british public so far?As for the soviet union thing don't make me laugh, the uk was long since a super power, there was only two players on that board game.
I might also add to her list of achievements that she supported and counted as her friends the most brutal regimes in the world( including suporting apartheid), used a war on the bloody falklands to rouse up some sort of national pride crap, brought N.Ireland to chaos, destroyed the labour force and used her police force like they were enforcing a military junta..the miners and the people of liverpool know only too well about that..she also most certainly covered up child sex abuse in the tories too..nice women ..
The verdict is well out on her Stan.
