|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Under 23 Player
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069 |
Sorry to open another thread. But I think this is worth looking at as a seperate thread.
I maintain he is worse for these reasons
1- duration Hodgson was only here a short time Rodgers has been playing poor for well over 18 months
2- owners Hodgson was in a turbulent time owners with FSG just coming in
3- backing Rodgers has been backed by hundreds of millions
4- Hodgson had a track record at other clubs not so Rodgers
5- the fans were on hodgsons back from day one with shameful chants from the Kop Troll or Manc
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
Sorry to open another thread. But I think this is worth looking at as a seperate thread.
I maintain he is worse for these reasons
1- duration Hodgson was only here a short time Rodgers has been playing poor for well over 18 months
2- owners Hodgson was in a turbulent time owners with FSG just coming in
3- backing Rodgers has been backed by hundreds of millions
4- Hodgson had a track record at other clubs not so Rodgers
5- the fans were on hodgsons back from day one with shameful chants from the Kop Troll or Manc You're mad. SP must be one of the oldest fans around
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128 |
Sorry to open another thread. But I think this is worth looking at as a seperate thread.
I maintain he is worse for these reasons
1- duration Hodgson was only here a short time Rodgers has been playing poor for well over 18 months
2- owners Hodgson was in a turbulent time owners with FSG just coming in
3- backing Rodgers has been backed by hundreds of millions
4- Hodgson had a track record at other clubs not so Rodgers
5- the fans were on hodgsons back from day one with shameful chants from the Kop Troll or Manc Well which is it, we haven't been sure, but you are one or the other.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205 |
Sorry to open another thread. But I think this is worth looking at as a seperate thread.
I maintain he is worse for these reasons
1- duration Hodgson was only here a short time Rodgers has been playing poor for well over 18 months
2- owners Hodgson was in a turbulent time owners with FSG just coming in
3- backing Rodgers has been backed by hundreds of millions
4- Hodgson had a track record at other clubs not so Rodgers
5- the fans were on hodgsons back from day one with shameful chants from the Kop Troll or Manc It's a tough call, but since you asked I'd say your just a random troll.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 573
Under 18 Player
|
|
Under 18 Player
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 573 |
Hodgson was much worse than Rodgers. Rodgers would have finished 7th or 8th when Rodgers finished 2nd. You would never have seen anything close to the level of entertainment with Hodgson. This doesn't mean that Rodgers should stay. Far from it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
OP
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
Hodgson was much worse than Rodgers. Rodgers would have finished 7th or 8th when Rodgers finished 2nd. You would never have seen anything close to the level of entertainment with Hodgson. This doesn't mean that Rodgers should stay. Far from it. Hodgson was only here a short time and although he made some bad signings they were small money and he made some good signings. Dalglish and Rodgers were given far longer and substantially more transfer funds, goodwill from the fans and stable owners and backing. But it's a moot point Rodgers is debatable with our worst managers in 70 years.
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069 |
Sorry to open another thread. But I think this is worth looking at as a seperate thread.
I maintain he is worse for these reasons
1- duration Hodgson was only here a short time Rodgers has been playing poor for well over 18 months
2- owners Hodgson was in a turbulent time owners with FSG just coming in
3- backing Rodgers has been backed by hundreds of millions
4- Hodgson had a track record at other clubs not so Rodgers
5- the fans were on hodgsons back from day one with shameful chants from the Kop Troll or Manc Well which is it, we haven't been sure, but you are one or the other. I am a troll because I get behind the team every game. I support the club not individual players or the manager which is why my opinions sometimes differs from others. I don't see the point in fans revolting it is not helping the team. I have never wanted Liverpool to lose. If we lose 4, 5-0 I'll be supporting them the next week as avidly as always do. I really want Liverpool to be successful. I've still got the Istanbul final on VHS and I've watched probably 10 times all the way through if not more. I am definitely not a manc. And I am not a troll. I'm not a plastic fan who thrives off seeing news signings or superstars every season. I will support the team no matter who is in charge or playing.
Last edited by RedScouser; 12/09/15 08:45 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650 |
Hardcore BR loyalists start giving it the whole "I support the team whoever is in charge" lark and BR should be getting very worried.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,229
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650 |
Everyone bar nobody was calling for that diamond and to have a real go at utd. I just knew he would put ings on the wing, he is clinging onto his job now and betting all on a point cause u can't sack a manager that gets a 0-0 at old toilet. He is past gone and FSG should be getting on the phone to people the weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
