KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,746
A
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
A Offline
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,746
Originally Posted By: Ninja Skrtel
I agree, he is toxic at the moment...quick question though. What if he REALLY does have the sh1ts and thats why he's missing training?


If he has then that is very very unfortunate timing given that he wants to miss the tour.

I am a manager in my job. Someone the other week swapped a duty with another staff member who subsequently needed to swap back and could not go through with the agreement. Imagine my surprise when the first person phoned in sick. No doubt they had a good night out and didn't give a fukk about everyone else.

I know what happened because there is previous.

Sterling is pulling BR's chain.
Sterling doesn't want to be there.

Yes it is toxic.
We need rid as soon as now.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,614
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,614
Most of what you said is fine but Alexis Sanchez would be an incredible buy and would far eclipse what we would get from Sterling.
In saying that, I'd keep him unless selling overseas and take some fringe talent from Madrid in the process.
Straight money would just be silly as we haven't spent it well previously and we would get fleeced for players by other clubs knowing how much money we have available.


Your friendly neighbourhood Spider-Man.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Originally Posted By: MyKneeGrows
Originally Posted By: RedScouser
£45 million should just about pay for maybe one of his arms. If City want him they should be paying £60+ million otherwise we should keep him.


I've decided to ignore the majority of your post and focus on the above. Bearing in mind the thread title is 'The numbers don't add up'.

If 45M pays for only an arm, shouldn't we be asking for close to £300M? I mean I've priced each leg higher than an arm as I believe them to be of more importance. You only want 60M for sterling as a whole? Jeez, you really do lack ambition.

Please get back to me so we can discuss this, cvnt to cvnt.


I lack ambition, you having me on?

If we sold Sterling's arm to City we will be left with a player with one arm. He won't be the same player and wouldn't be good enough for Liverpool. I would accept £45 million for his arm because it would stop other teams from using him against us.

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,543
Yeah imagine how terrible his "body work" ( sick ) would be with only one arm.

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Originally Posted By: RedsforChampions
Originally Posted By: RedScouser
Let's presume we sell Sterling for a total fee of £45 mil. And for simplicity lets say Liverpool are left with £35 million after giving QPR their reported 20% share.

Sterling is a world-class talent. £45 million should just about pay for maybe one of his arms. If City want him they should be paying £60+ million otherwise we should keep him.

With this measly £35 million in the bank we could have in theory bought the following:


Luke Shaw + Rickie Lambert
Benteke + new contract for BR
Andy Carroll
Lallana + Borini
Markovic + Allen
Half of Luis Suarez
Mangala
Fernandinho
Alexis Sanchez
Juan Mata
A new yacht for John Henry

None of these investments would be as beneficial as keeping Sterling. Sterling hasn't let the club down. They and his agent have let him down.




Idiots will never understand maths.


What, you've called yourself an idiot? That's a bit harsh.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion