KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#490947 10/07/15 04:15 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Let's presume we sell Sterling for a total fee of £45 mil. And for simplicity lets say Liverpool are left with £35 million after giving QPR their reported 20% share.

Sterling is a world-class talent. £45 million should just about pay for maybe one of his arms. If City want him they should be paying £60+ million otherwise we should keep him.

With this measly £35 million in the bank we could have in theory bought the following:


Luke Shaw + Rickie Lambert
Benteke + new contract for BR
Andy Carroll
Lallana + Borini
Markovic + Allen
Half of Luis Suarez
Mangala
Fernandinho
Alexis Sanchez
Juan Mata
A new yacht for John Henry

None of these investments would be as beneficial as keeping Sterling. Sterling hasn't let the club down. They and his agent have let him down.



Last edited by RedScouser; 10/07/15 04:18 AM.
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,886
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,886
The England international was absent from the squad’s pre-season preparations at Melwood for the second successive day after reporting in ill again.

It is understood Sterling has already spoken to manager Brendan Rodgers this week to tell him he did not want to travel on the tour to Asia and Australia.

“Sterling is doing LFC a favour by staying away,” Beglin wrote on Twitter.

“You don’t want that kind of attitude anywhere near a dressing room.”



I won't reply to your latest WUM poll but will say- here is a former professional LIVERPOOL player in Jim Beglin who understands the situation a little more than you clearly do.

Your ignorance in regard a player who has decided to take the route they have in the manner they have is breathtaking.

How about pulling your head in for once and realise that situation reading ain't your strong point son!


Last edited by Top4; 10/07/15 05:11 AM.

Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

George Washington
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,069
Originally Posted By: Top4
The England international was absent from the squad’s pre-season preparations at Melwood for the second successive day after reporting in ill again.

It is understood Sterling has already spoken to manager Brendan Rodgers this week to tell him he did not want to travel on the tour to Asia and Australia.

“Sterling is doing LFC a favour by staying away,” Beglin wrote on Twitter.

“You don’t want that kind of attitude anywhere near a dressing room.”



I won't reply to your latest WUM poll but will say- here is a former professional LIVERPOOL player in Jim Beglin who understands the situation a little more than you clearly do.

Your ignorance in regard a player who has decided to take the route they have in the manner they have is breathtaking.

How about pulling your head in for once and realise that situation reading ain't your strong point son!



I agree with Beglin. You don't want a negative influence affecting other players. He needs to get his head sorted and then start training with the team. Otherwise, he can train on his own or be disciplined until he realises it is his only option.

May be I am reading it wrongly. However it can not be part of any of FSG's policies to sell an exceptional 20 year-old talent to a rival club. It will be a real low point for Liverpool.

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 161
A
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
A Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 161
Seriously ? I cannot understand how anybody would want to see him near a Liverpool shirt again he is everything wrong with football.

He has caused no end of issues with his off field antics was even a used of hitting his girlfriend then has audacity to behave like this all these little things now seem more plausible in truth to me how about whining about being tired to Roy Hodson also ?

More important he is not even a great player Aaron Lennon is all he is.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
I agree, he is toxic at the moment...quick question though. What if he REALLY does have the sh1ts and thats why he's missing training?


Sign Reus
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 161
A
Under 16 Player
Under 16 Player
A Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 161
About all is does is run with no end product 😄

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
F
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
Originally Posted By: RedScouser
Let's presume we sell Sterling for a total fee of £45 mil. And for simplicity lets say Liverpool are left with £35 million after giving QPR their reported 20% share.

Sterling is a world-class talent. £45 million should just about pay for maybe one of his arms. If City want him they should be paying £60+ million otherwise we should keep him.

With this measly £35 million in the bank we could have in theory bought the following:


Luke Shaw + Rickie Lambert
Benteke + new contract for BR
Andy Carroll
Lallana + Borini
Markovic + Allen
Half of Luis Suarez
Mangala
Fernandinho
Alexis Sanchez
Juan Mata
A new yacht for John Henry

None of these investments would be as beneficial as keeping Sterling. Sterling hasn't let the club down. They and his agent have let him down.


never heard so much utter tripe in my life i cant believe liverpool fans are still willing to back this no mark sterling .

M
MyKneeGrows
Unregistered
MyKneeGrows
Unregistered
M
Originally Posted By: RedScouser
£45 million should just about pay for maybe one of his arms. If City want him they should be paying £60+ million otherwise we should keep him.


I've decided to ignore the majority of your post and focus on the above. Bearing in mind the thread title is 'The numbers don't add up'.

If 45M pays for only an arm, shouldn't we be asking for close to £300M? I mean I've priced each leg higher than an arm as I believe them to be of more importance. You only want 60M for sterling as a whole? Jeez, you really do lack ambition.

Please get back to me so we can discuss this, cvnt to cvnt.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
V
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
V Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 9,605
laugh

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: RedScouser
Let's presume we sell Sterling for a total fee of £45 mil. And for simplicity lets say Liverpool are left with £35 million after giving QPR their reported 20% share.

Sterling is a world-class talent. £45 million should just about pay for maybe one of his arms. If City want him they should be paying £60+ million otherwise we should keep him.

With this measly £35 million in the bank we could have in theory bought the following:


Luke Shaw + Rickie Lambert
Benteke + new contract for BR
Andy Carroll
Lallana + Borini
Markovic + Allen
Half of Luis Suarez
Mangala
Fernandinho
Alexis Sanchez
Juan Mata
A new yacht for John Henry

None of these investments would be as beneficial as keeping Sterling. Sterling hasn't let the club down. They and his agent have let him down.




Idiots will never understand maths.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion