|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084 |
Oooh i could crush a grape!
That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128 |
[quote=fazakerley red 1]yes i asked suso to go and boil his head and do us all a favour , its not a term of endearment . Well u should have a word with whoever boiled your own cos they left it in the pot far too long. my head not boiled mate , i am very much ok , i have never understood the hatred some have towards me in this forum . [/qu You are getting hatred mixed up with banter. How you could think that strangers on a footy site could hate someone they have't even met is beyond me. But sure there's nowt stranger than folk.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084 |
yes i asked suso to go and boil his head and do us all a favour , its not a term of endearment . Well u should have a word with whoever boiled your own cos they left it in the pot far too long. my head not boiled mate , i am very much ok , i have never understood the hatred some have towards me in this forum . There's a fine line between love and hate Faz,imo i think Shaggy is just flirting with you.
That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
well its my opinion , i have my view on my team some dont like it , i agree and disagree but it seems my posts get picked out for personal treatment , but there you go .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084 |
That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128 |
well its my opinion , i have my view on my team some dont like it , i agree and disagree but it seems my posts get picked out for personal treatment , but there you go .
Well its paranoia, if people disagree with your view point it doesn't follow that they hate you. And the reason you get so many comments on your posts is because post so many. Group hug for faz everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595 |
ings is a good player.. lets not start him off on a negative. If he is red then unwavering support until he can be judged on the pitch I think you’re missing the point there EMP, its not about Ings on a personal level really. It’s what this type of signing says about the levels we’re going after, and what that level says about our ambition. I’d have no problem with Ings if we were signing two top class strikers in addition, but I don’t think we have the slightest intention of that, and that’s the point I’m making. He’s a young prospect on a free and not on high wages, and if thats the level we sign for our 1st eleven players, it tells us all we need to know about our title ambition or the lack of it. Signing prospects is fine as long as we’re also signing proven top quality for areas needing strengthening, but we don’t do that do we? And what does that say about our ambition?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,908
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,908 |
Milner -on a free- is defo a good addition to the team. Ings would most probably score more goals next season than the whole of our forward line this season. Certainly much better than Lambert, Aspas or Borini. There's nothing wrong with signing them as long as they are not thought of as our main signings for next season.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 9,650 |
ings is a good player.. lets not start him off on a negative. If he is red then unwavering support until he can be judged on the pitch I think you’re missing the point there EMP, its not about Ings on a personal level really. It’s what this type of signing says about the levels we’re going after, and what that level says about our ambition. I’d have no problem with Ings if we were signing two top class strikers in addition, but I don’t think we have the slightest intention of that, and that’s the point I’m making. He’s a young prospect on a free and not on high wages, and if thats the level we sign for our 1st eleven players, it tells us all we need to know about our title ambition or the lack of it. Signing prospects is fine as long as we’re also signing proven top quality for areas needing strengthening, but we don’t do that do we? And what does that say about our ambition? yeah but i worry about ings himself..u just know one first bad touch and the fans will be on his back cause he isn't 40m . it starts with this danny ings ffs lark. better to nip it in the bud. Complain about fsg lack of ambition sure but the fecking danny ings thing won't help the player
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278 |
We need a top quality striker .. That can stay fit and play 90% of the games per season
Then.. I wud be happy for our 4 strikers to be ...
Main striker ?
Danny.. If he can stay fit
Austin
Ings
|
|
|
|
|
