KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
Lazar Markovic‘s first season in a Liverpool shirt has been one of great disappointment, but there are understandable reasons why, writes Henry Jackson.

While it is fully understandable to have expected a little more from Markovic in his maiden season on Merseyside, to sell him this soon would be extremely unfair.

The Serbia international is clearly a talent with bags of potential, and unlike Johnson, Enrique and others, is at an age where he is worth persevering with.

There are clear reasons why he hasn’t yet succeeded at Anfield, too.

Played out of Position

Markovic made his name for Benfica as an attacking wide man, predominantly on the left-hand side of a front three, and he moved to Liverpool with a reputation as one of Europe’s most exciting young players.

Former Chelsea manager Avram Grant famously claimed that, “apart from Ronaldo and Messi, Markovic is one of the best talents I’ve ever seen at 19 years of age”, while Blues midfielder and compatriot Nemanja Matic said, “he could be one of Europe’s best players in his position”.

It seems baffling, therefore, that during the 2014/15 campaign, Markovic virtually never played in his favoured position at any point.

In fact, it was only on his debut as a substitute at Man City in August that he has played there, and he looked very promising, combining pace, dribbling and an admirable work rate to good effect.

On his Anfield bow—the 1-0 loss at home to Aston Villa in September—Brendan Rodgers first deployed the flying winger on the right flank, a role which would endure.

Markovic failed to ignite in that role, and while this was partly down to growing accustomed to the pace and power of the Premier League, being played out of position certainly played its part.

A needless red card against Basel in the Champions League didn’t help matters either.

When Rodgers decided to change his system to 3-4-2-1 following a string of wretched results, Markovic shone on several occasions at both right and left wing-back.

His most notable performance came at Sunderland in January, when he scored the game’s only goal and was the Reds’ greatest attacking threat.

The 3-4-2-1 was soon negated by opponents, however, and Markovic’s form and overall influence dimished because of it.

Surplus to Requirements?

Having featured sporadically up until Liverpool’s 2-1 win over City at Anfield in early April, Markovic was seemingly cast aside by Rodgers.

In their final 11 league games, the 18-cap Serbia star played a total of just 70 minutes of football, making cameos against Hull City and QPR, and playing just a half away to Arsenal.

While Markovic’s form had clearly not been at its best, the decision to completely fade him out—given the fact plenty of others were also struggling—makes little sense on the manager’s behalf.

There have been endless opportunities for Rodgers to start the former Benfica man on the left of a front three, perhaps with Raheem Sterling on the right and Philippe Coutinho in a ‘false nine’ role, but it’s never remotely looked like happening.

This lack of playing time has to be of concern for Markovic, and Rodgers has shown in the past that once he gives up on a player, the end is invariably nigh.

The Future

If Liverpool did decide to offload Markovic in the summer it would be a very poor decision. With it looking more and more likely that FSG will give Brendan Rodgers another year in charge, why are they not showing a similar level of patience with a 21-year-old full of raw talent?

Of course, just two goals in 19 league appearances—three in 34 in all competitions—is disappointing when £20 million has been paid for his services, but that doesn’t tell the whole story.

As Jack Lusby perfectly eludes to for Bleacher Report, “Markovic has been a victim of his own versatility”.

He has shown that he can perform in a number of other roles, and because of it, he has never been able to truly show what he’s made of in a position where he terrorised defenders back in Portugal.

Judging any young player after just one season in arguably Europe’s most physically demanding league is harsh, let alone one who has not yet been let off his leash.

There is no guarantee that Markovic will blossom into the world-beater some expect him to be one day, but he has to be given at least another year to sway the doubters.

With Sterling looking ever more likely to move away this summer, who’s to say Markovic won’t slot into the Englishman’s role and really start to make a name for himself?
Can Lazar Markovic grow into a key role in the Liverpool first team?
single choice
Votes accepted starting: 29/05/15 08:35 PM
You must vote before you can view the results of this poll.


Sign Reus
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,661
W
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
W Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,661
It puzzles me why BR constantly plays Sterling in a attacking role.

Markovic is twice the player Sterling is, Sterling who cannot cross, runs into deadends and loses the ball week in week out, Markovic should have been give a chance.


Hopefully with the departure of BR and Sterling, Klopp will play Markovic in the correct position.

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
S
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
Paid far too much for him, which isn't his fault.

Poor first season but will hopefully improve.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
F
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
F Offline
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
still a young player who showed flashes of what he could do , i would certainly keep lazar .

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
Lazar has been a disaster signing costing the club a fortune. He is a 5m player at best. Rodgers recalled Ibe to do the job because he can no longer rely on Markovic. I sense a bit of bias in this thread from Ninja as he is from your country but in truth this signing has failed miserably.


Back to Back World Champions baby!
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,824
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,824
He hasn't played in a natural position at all. I think his problem is that his position lies somewhere between Coutinho and Sterling and without two strikers, we can't afford to play him there. Next season, however, should be very different.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: Ninja Skrtel
Lazar Markovic‘s first season in a Liverpool shirt has been one of great disappointment, but there are understandable reasons why, writes Henry Jackson.

While it is fully understandable to have expected a little more from Markovic in his maiden season on Merseyside, to sell him this soon would be extremely unfair.

The Serbia international is clearly a talent with bags of potential, and unlike Johnson, Enrique and others, is at an age where he is worth persevering with.

There are clear reasons why he hasn’t yet succeeded at Anfield, too.

Played out of Position

Markovic made his name for Benfica as an attacking wide man, predominantly on the left-hand side of a front three, and he moved to Liverpool with a reputation as one of Europe’s most exciting young players.

Former Chelsea manager Avram Grant famously claimed that, “apart from Ronaldo and Messi, Markovic is one of the best talents I’ve ever seen at 19 years of age”, while Blues midfielder and compatriot Nemanja Matic said, “he could be one of Europe’s best players in his position”.

It seems baffling, therefore, that during the 2014/15 campaign, Markovic virtually never played in his favoured position at any point.

In fact, it was only on his debut as a substitute at Man City in August that he has played there, and he looked very promising, combining pace, dribbling and an admirable work rate to good effect.

On his Anfield bow—the 1-0 loss at home to Aston Villa in September—Brendan Rodgers first deployed the flying winger on the right flank, a role which would endure.

Markovic failed to ignite in that role, and while this was partly down to growing accustomed to the pace and power of the Premier League, being played out of position certainly played its part.

A needless red card against Basel in the Champions League didn’t help matters either.

When Rodgers decided to change his system to 3-4-2-1 following a string of wretched results, Markovic shone on several occasions at both right and left wing-back.

His most notable performance came at Sunderland in January, when he scored the game’s only goal and was the Reds’ greatest attacking threat.

The 3-4-2-1 was soon negated by opponents, however, and Markovic’s form and overall influence dimished because of it.

Surplus to Requirements?

Having featured sporadically up until Liverpool’s 2-1 win over City at Anfield in early April, Markovic was seemingly cast aside by Rodgers.

In their final 11 league games, the 18-cap Serbia star played a total of just 70 minutes of football, making cameos against Hull City and QPR, and playing just a half away to Arsenal.

While Markovic’s form had clearly not been at its best, the decision to completely fade him out—given the fact plenty of others were also struggling—makes little sense on the manager’s behalf.

There have been endless opportunities for Rodgers to start the former Benfica man on the left of a front three, perhaps with Raheem Sterling on the right and Philippe Coutinho in a ‘false nine’ role, but it’s never remotely looked like happening.

This lack of playing time has to be of concern for Markovic, and Rodgers has shown in the past that once he gives up on a player, the end is invariably nigh.

The Future

If Liverpool did decide to offload Markovic in the summer it would be a very poor decision. With it looking more and more likely that FSG will give Brendan Rodgers another year in charge, why are they not showing a similar level of patience with a 21-year-old full of raw talent?

Of course, just two goals in 19 league appearances—three in 34 in all competitions—is disappointing when £20 million has been paid for his services, but that doesn’t tell the whole story.

As Jack Lusby perfectly eludes to for Bleacher Report, “Markovic has been a victim of his own versatility”.

He has shown that he can perform in a number of other roles, and because of it, he has never been able to truly show what he’s made of in a position where he terrorised defenders back in Portugal.

Judging any young player after just one season in arguably Europe’s most physically demanding league is harsh, let alone one who has not yet been let off his leash.

There is no guarantee that Markovic will blossom into the world-beater some expect him to be one day, but he has to be given at least another year to sway the doubters.

With Sterling looking ever more likely to move away this summer, who’s to say Markovic won’t slot into the Englishman’s role and really start to make a name for himself?



Though I think there was no need to buy him and the money better utilised in other positions, I find no reason so sell him now at a loss because he has hardly been played. A new manager can get more of him as it was in his previous team. Under Rodgers however, he might end up like Alberto.

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,886
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,886
For the money paid flashes don't cut it at all. Up to now he has been very poor for the money but his age and adjustment issues warrant another year.

However, it always appears our players will be the ones who will come good next season why is that?


Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

George Washington
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: sixtiesred
Seems most see him as a good prospect but we need the spine to be sorted before anyone is going to reach full potential


The head of the spine, ie, the manager needs to be sorted first.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
Can I just ask what TCP stands for?


Sign Reus
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion