KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 29 1 2 3 4 5 … 28 29
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Originally Posted By: gnp-uk
Shaw is on 127k per week

Falcao is on zillions

Plenty of teams out they're that are willing to pay sterling 130K plus per week ..

Football is abt business 1st and the rest follows ....



Who's willing to pay him £130k a week then? Name names please with some evidence preferably.

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
H Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
Originally Posted By: Shaggydog
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Faz since when has this been about the fans ability to pay ?

The only variable is which loyal fan jumps off first
what has he done to warrant this sort of pay rise ? , 6 goals this season and he is a forward , yes he has improved a lot , but no way is he in this sort of wage bracket yet , as i say him and his agent are wrong on this , and personally if he want to leave then liverpool should cash in , ibe in the first team now and origi arrives in the summer would it be a big loss ??


Ibe has played a handful of games and Origi scored for the first time in 5 months yesterday.

OF COURSE HE WOULD BE A BIG LOSS.

Yes he would be a big loss, and I’m wondering what’s the point in nurturing young prospects like him and others, if it’s only going to benefit other club's including possibly our direct competitors? Are we now a selling club that feeds the big boys? Or will we pay our emerging talent the going market rate and fight for our place at the top? Because that’s what’s at stake here. We’ve opted out of the infrastructural race, we opted out of the signing on and wage competition some time ago, and are we now going to opt out of keeping our emerging talent because of a refusal to pay them the going market rate? If we do it will signal to me a deliberate decision to operate and compete around mid point of the top half of the PL, because that will almost certainly be the eventual outcome of such a policy. Should we fans be happy with that?

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
I keep hearing this 'going rate ' term but what is the going rate for a 20 year old prospect if it's not £100k a week? A quick look on Google and if he gets his £150k, he'd be up there with the likes of Sanchez, Cesc, Terry, Mata and the like (depending on where you read). For me he should be no where near the same price as that bunch as he's still not the finished article!

I wouldn't mind better that if we buckle to what he wants, he'll turn into an even bigger Bertie big bollox and go [oops] just like after his first England cap.

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,813
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,813
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1

KopTalk
12 mins ·
Latest credible reports claim that Raheem Sterling is demanding a staggering £150,000-a-week in wages and not £120,000-a-week as first thought. Wow!

personally this sort of demand is out of order he is not at that level , him and his agent are wrong on this .



I'm not so sure that £150k per week is an unreasonable request. He's one of the best players at one of the best clubs in the richest league in the world. Why shouldn't he be paid that kind of money when you see what other, far inferior players are earning?

The new TV deal means the clubs will be far wealthier so it's probably in line with the additional tv money that will be coming in.

Here's the funniest thing though......a lot of LFC fans moan that the club don't pay enough in wages and end up with sub-standard players. We now have a genuine star who was named as the best young player in Europe just a few months ago.......and people are complaining that his wage demands are too high!!!! The mind boggles.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: Darcus
Originally Posted By: fazakerley red 1

KopTalk
12 mins ·
Latest credible reports claim that Raheem Sterling is demanding a staggering £150,000-a-week in wages and not £120,000-a-week as first thought. Wow!

personally this sort of demand is out of order he is not at that level , him and his agent are wrong on this .



I'm not so sure that £150k per week is an unreasonable request. He's one of the best players at one of the best clubs in the richest league in the world. Why shouldn't he be paid that kind of money when you see what other, far inferior players are earning?

The new TV deal means the clubs will be far wealthier so it's probably in line with the additional tv money that will be coming in.

Here's the funniest thing though......a lot of LFC fans moan that the club don't pay enough in wages and end up with sub-standard players. We now have a genuine star who was named as the best young player in Europe just a few months ago.......and people are complaining that his wage demands are too high!!!! The mind boggles.



150k is definitely unreasonable

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
H Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
I keep hearing this 'going rate ' term but what is the going rate for a 20 year old prospect if it's not £100k a week? A quick look on Google and if he gets his £150k, he'd be up there with the likes of Sanchez, Cesc, Terry, Mata and the like (depending on where you read). For me he should be no where near the same price as that bunch as he's still not the finished article!

I wouldn't mind better that if we buckle to what he wants, he'll turn into an even bigger Bertie big bollox and go [oops] just like after his first England cap.

Well I understand what you’re getting at there wilkij, However for fan’s of a club that almost exclusively signs ‘prospects’, it seems somewhat ironic that we should have to even discuss that question though. For me Sterling has done enough to justify a further investment in his additional potential that’s yet to emerge, and that’s what any suitor would be investing in, were they to come in for him. Also you must bear in mind he was an England international at 19 years of age so other clubs know the potential to be world class is there, whether or not it ever emerges. I’d be surprised if a few of the big boys don’t start sniffing around now that we've allowed him to go on the market.

Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,039
W
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
W Offline
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,039
So what? I imagine he's already been offered more elsewhere. We should pay up or he's gone. Its a lot but its how football is, there are worse players in the premier league on more

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 6
N
Trialist
Trialist
N Offline
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 6
If we do get offered 50 million pounds for him I say we'd be errant fools not to sell him.

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
H Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
Originally Posted By: nsanchiz
If we do get offered 50 million pounds for him I say we'd be errant fools not to sell him.

Oh yeah, and buy two and half potentials @ £20m + 20m + 10m for the half potential, that’ll go down well with FSG, but it won’t win you much, will it?

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 537
Under 18 Player
Under 18 Player
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 537
i blame jimmy hill for getting the wage cap scrapped... They'd all be on £20 a week otherwise...

Page 3 of 29 1 2 3 4 5 … 28 29

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion