Didn't they pay a huge loan fee for him aswell? I think all in we'll be better off from Mario and Lambert than they are with him but it doesn't really mean they're better signings. Just cheaper.
According to records he is on 250k per week and 6m loan fee which gets to 19m. So United would have spent less than us even if we can sell both for 20m this summer. Looks to me that we took a bigger risk.
this post makes no sense whatsoever...firstly, the figures i found are 15.6 million per year in wages, which works out to 300k. Secondly, unless if we sell the pair of Lambert and Balloteli for the peanuts, they will have spent more.
Mario is on 110k and Lambert on 40k. over a season that works out to 7.8 mil whilst Falcao is on 15.6...so double.
So we are saving 7.8 mil on wages, we paid 14 mil more if you take just the basic loan fee for Falcao, so we are taking a hit of 6.2mil if we give the two away for free.
Do you relly think we will recoup less than 6.2 mil on the two of them?