|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
well do you think sturridges injury is a joke ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
MyKneeGrows
Unregistered
|
|
MyKneeGrows
Unregistered
|
Nah just you fella 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 12,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,444 |
Nah just you fella oh i am a joke ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
MyKneeGrows
Unregistered
|
|
MyKneeGrows
Unregistered
|
Nah just you fella oh i am a joke ? Yup
|
|
|
|
|
|
MyKneeGrows
Unregistered
|
|
MyKneeGrows
Unregistered
|
He hasn't been this injury prone before in his career so sixties you can't really play the 'oh look at me I knew it' card Why didn't chealsea play him more and why did they sell him so cheap to a rival ? Ok I might not be right but it does look that way Plus I did think this would happen , posted it would happen and unfortunatly it has happened so I think I can don't you  Because they spent 50M on Torres and had an interfering owner who wanted him played, despite his poor scoring record for Chelsea. They could've used him last season, maybe they would've won the title - Maybe it's all part of their master plan, but as you seem to be in the know, you should be telling me, I guess. Well they probably knew playing him will depreciate his value more ? he hasn't been this injury prone you say maybe because he hadnt played many games ! What English player of around 22 especially a striker has been sold this cheap ! had to be a reason ? look I could be wrong but it looks that way to me Imo no need for the pi$$ take its just from observations with danny and that with suarez gone he was going to get all the knocks and I didn't think he could handle it imo that's all I sorta expected it as others will tell you I went on a bit about it  They wanted to depreciate his value? Thanks for clearing that up. Despite his injury record with us, Chelsea still made a mistake selling him so cheaply. You're making it out as if Chelsea have done us over.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,262
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,262 |
We got a good deal from Chelsea and danny will score goals. Its the other strikers I am more worried about TBH
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394 |
[quote=MyKneeGrows][quote=sixtiesred][quote=MyKneeGrows] Well they probably knew playing him will depreciate his value more ? he hasn't been this injury prone you say maybe because he hadnt played many games ! What English player of around 22 especially a striker has been sold this cheap ! had to be a reason ? look I could be wrong but it looks that way to me Imo no need for the pi$$ take its just from observations with danny and that with suarez gone he was going to get all the knocks and I didn't think he could handle it imo that's all I sorta expected it as others will tell you I went on a bit about it They wanted to depreciate his value? Thanks for clearing that up. Despite his injury record with us, Chelsea still made a mistake selling him so cheaply. You're making it out as if Chelsea have done us over. Danny missed 9 games last year. That's hardly an injury prone player to me when you look back at Torres who only had one season for us playing over 30 games, Michael Owen was the same. Look at Van Persie and his record for all but 2 seasons and I even Drogba, a player who you would think as being robust, hasn't played a full season. Now the stats I looked at to check this didn't say why they missed games so some could be suspensions but for me, Danny isn't that injury prone.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926 |
[quote=MyKneeGrows][quote=sixtiesred][quote=MyKneeGrows] Well they probably knew playing him will depreciate his value more ? he hasn't been this injury prone you say maybe because he hadnt played many games ! What English player of around 22 especially a striker has been sold this cheap ! had to be a reason ? look I could be wrong but it looks that way to me Imo no need for the pi$$ take its just from observations with danny and that with suarez gone he was going to get all the knocks and I didn't think he could handle it imo that's all I sorta expected it as others will tell you I went on a bit about it They wanted to depreciate his value? Thanks for clearing that up. Despite his injury record with us, Chelsea still made a mistake selling him so cheaply. You're making it out as if Chelsea have done us over. Danny missed 9 games last year. That's hardly an injury prone player to me when you look back at Torres who only had one season for us playing over 30 games, Michael Owen was the same. Look at Van Persie and his record for all but 2 seasons and I even Drogba, a player who you would think as being robust, hasn't played a full season. Now the stats I looked at to check this didn't say why they missed games so some could be suspensions but for me, Danny isn't that injury prone. I think he is quite injury prone just as Van Persie. Owen was also injury prone while Torres suffered a bad injury long term which is different and can happen to anybody. By injury prone I mean regular not so serious injuries mainly muscular.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278 |
Danny is still Lfc top goal scorer this season
So far loooool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
