KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 10 of 11 1 2 … 8 9 10 11
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
And he'd suit Stoke if they were already winning and they had a [oops] load of cash!

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,381
B
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
B Offline
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,381
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
You would try and get the best you can. My point is, that Maureen has never built anything.

He's always taken over at clubs where the team is there. Porto, Chelsea, Inter, Real and now Chresea again. All successful teams. But if you look at Ferguson and Wenger to some extent they've built what they got, especially bacon face. They, if they had the egos, could rightfully call themselves the special ones.


He's certainly not built a dynasty you're quite right, but he takes these teams that aren't performing to the level they should, adds a couple of players, and consistently wins titles and European trophies to a certain extent. In different countries I might add, I'd say that was very special, and I'd be very surprised if big sam could do that.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: sixtiesred
Originally Posted By: RedsforChampions
Originally Posted By: sixtiesred
So that's how much we have really spent when players sales are taken into account ?


Yep, 36m


So is that a lot based on our income doesn't seem to be but I'm not a full quid on this ?


Well, we are being investigated under FFP, so I would assume we wouldn't be too far if we haven't exceeded. Actually, I don't think the net spent would be a problem as it will come to about 9m per annum if depreciated over 4 years, but additional wages would probably more than double that figure. We were loss making in previous seasons but with additional tv revenues + sponsorship deals signed, we should be about there. We'll know more when the latest Annual Report comes out.

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,988
Last I read we were making losses on the previous 3 seasons so the investigation does not include this summers spending of 35 net which should be fine.


Back to Back World Champions baby!
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: Snakeye
Last I read we were making losses on the previous 3 seasons so the investigation does not include this summers spending of 35 net which should be fine.


Of course, but it was just to have an idea on this year's income based on previous seasons' figures

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,886
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,886
Going by the look of things it isn't going to matter anyhow is it? We have a cat in hells chance of making the CL again next year by the first 11 played.


Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.

George Washington
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,908
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,908
R shou
Originally Posted By: bigredkop
Originally Posted By: wilkij1975
You would try and get the best you can. My point is, that Maureen has never built anything.

He's always taken over at clubs where the team is there. Porto, Chelsea, Inter, Real and now Chresea again. All successful teams. But if you look at Ferguson and Wenger to some extent they've built what they got, especially bacon face. They, if they had egos, could rightfully call themselves the special ones.


He's certainly not built a dynasty you're quite right, but he takes these teams that aren't performing to the level they should, adds a couple of players, and consistently wins titles and European trophies to a certain extent. In different countries I might add, I'd say that was very special, and I'd be very surprised if big sam could do that.
Are their people in hear seriously comparing poor old sam to maureen? Regarding the poll question, I believe BR should be given time as he's earned his right to it last season.

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
G
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
G Offline
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,278
Danny n Suarez got the team to 2nd place ...

Danny injured
Suarez sold

Br can't cut it at this club ....

He's got no plan A

Never mind a plan B

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: gnp-uk
Danny n Suarez got the team to 2nd place ...

Danny injured
Suarez sold

Br can't cut it at this club ....

He's got no plan A

Never mind a plan B


Looks like the majority here who have a stand (whether representative or not) would like to give Rodgers more time. Hopefully, this doesn't cost us CL qualification.

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 30
Trialist
Trialist
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 30
Man-U just won Arsenal and they have so many injuries in their squad.Thats the difference,The MANAGER........I said last season in my few posts when everyone was on a Hype that our manager was a huge problem.We out scored so many teams but our downfall was BR.The play from the back aswell as the possesion we keep at the back.It made Gerard,Toure,Skirtel etc all look bad.We leaked goals because of that silly tactic that doesnt suite us at all.He came from Swansea and i see they still playing the same without him.Lovren,Lalana,Lambert etc all played well last season where they came from,why so dire now.By not removing this man is suicidal to this great club.Our strikers took us to that 2nd place and Br kept us from winning the league.

Page 10 of 11 1 2 … 8 9 10 11

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion