KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 28 of 31 1 2 … 26 27 28 29 30 31
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Originally Posted By: boxmonkey
We've outspent united in the last 20 years of the premier league. It's not all about the money.


When I talk about spending money I don't just mean on players this is the whole point I am making and have always made


But the only reason you want the big stadium is so we can spend more on players. Which is something we have done more of than united during the whole premiere league history. The gap between a 70-80k stadium and a 60-70k stadium revenue wise is going to be very marginal in the future due to the growing influence of tv money and sponsors. The only time having a huge stadium will benefit a club is if things return to the days of old when 90% of a clubs revenue came through the turnstile.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Don't agree I think the stadium is about far more than match tickets it's an enabler for a huge range of commercial opportunities and sponsorship / tourism etc. I went to Barcelona a few years back to see the nou camp was the main reason I went there. Liverpool is a city every bit as attractive as Barcelona these days and will be more so with the Atlantic gateway


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
How much money does a stadium like old Trafford get through people visiting for a tour though? I mean people that aren't united fans, because I would imagine its very few. Barcelona is one of the best city's in the world and lots of people do visit the stadium because of the stadium but I wouldn't imagine it generates vast income.

On the point about sponsorship deals, I don't believe and never will believe that any club is sponsored beacuse of the stadium. It's all about the winning brand nothing else. The only time the stadium matters is when your talking naming rights.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
Also, the Nou Camp is not so famous because its big, but because of Barcelona's footballing success.


Sign Reus
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: boxmonkey
How much money does a stadium like old Trafford get through people visiting for a tour though? I mean people that aren't united fans, because I would imagine its very few. Barcelona is one of the best city's in the world and lots of people do visit the stadium because of the stadium but I wouldn't imagine it generates vast income.

On the point about sponsorship deals, I don't believe and never will believe that any club is sponsored beacuse of the stadium. It's all about the winning brand nothing else. The only time the stadium matters is when your talking naming rights.


It's over the long term and Liverpool is a pretty fantastic city and marko Liverpool have not done bad for success. People accuse me of not reading posts I assure you I read them all. Can I ask you read the original post on this thread and you too marko have a read, Long term not immediately expecting ticket prices alone to pay for it. That demands a long term view owners capable of putting significant equity into the club and being prepared to develop it.

Last edited by Stanley Park; 12/09/14 06:15 PM.

IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Originally Posted By: boxmonkey
How much money does a stadium like old Trafford get through people visiting for a tour though? I mean people that aren't united fans, because I would imagine its very few. Barcelona is one of the best city's in the world and lots of people do visit the stadium because of the stadium but I wouldn't imagine it generates vast income.

On the point about sponsorship deals, I don't believe and never will believe that any club is sponsored beacuse of the stadium. It's all about the winning brand nothing else. The only time the stadium matters is when your talking naming rights.


It's over the long term and Liverpool is a pretty fantastic city and marko Liverpool have not done bad for success. People accuse me of not reading posts I assure you I read them all. Can I ask you read the original post on this thread and you too marko have a read, Long term not immediately expecting ticket prices alone to pay for it. That demands a long term view owners capable of putting significant equity into the club and being prepared to develop it.


I am sure that tourists would be more interested to visit Anfield for its history rather than a shiny new stadium. When I went to LFC I made it a must to visit Anfield even if its old, I wanted to see the kop. So saying that more tourists would come because of a new stadium is nonsense. Also, whether short or long term there is no business case to build a new stadium

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
H
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
H Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,595
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
I fail to see how we can match or better man united / Man City unless we have comparable or better facilities than them. I dont think thats an unreasonable assertion. The only way I can see we can do better is if we consistently (and by some way) better them on the field to such an extent the success overtakes the physical size of the club. But we will have to do this every year and for all time and with the handicap of lower transfer budgets. Forgive me but that seems a tall order to me. In which those who would want a reduced facility at Liverpool are accepting of the clubs reduced long term capability. And for what ? To protect an owner they have never met, never will meet and who probably sees them as no more than commodities to enrich himself. Maybe I am getting old because thats not football club support as I know it.
I know I'm getting old, but I'm damned sure that's not football club support as I know it either. And the funny part of all this is that we're only talking about the transfer price of a few top quality players, at today's prices, to bridge the difference between the 160redevelopment as against about 450m for a decent stadium with expansion potential.
It's not as if we we're saving the money for top quality signings, as FSG haven't sanctioned any transfer above 25m, and that only buys you a medium quality player in today's market.
It's penny pinching and it'll stand as a monument to short sighted financial expediency and cowardice for a generation at least. What a tragedy for LFC, Liverpool City and the match going fans.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: boxmonkey
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
Originally Posted By: boxmonkey
We've outspent united in the last 20 years of the premier league. It's not all about the money.


When I talk about spending money I don't just mean on players this is the whole point I am making and have always made


But the only reason you want the big stadium is so we can spend more on players. Which is something we have done more of than united during the whole premiere league history. The gap between a 70-80k stadium and a 60-70k stadium revenue wise is going to be very marginal in the future due to the growing influence of tv money and sponsors. The only time having a huge stadium will benefit a club is if things return to the days of old when 90% of a clubs revenue came through the turnstile.


No you don't get it, he wants a bigger stadium for more supply so that ticket prices can decrease. His hate for FSG started when they increased the ticket price, remember? He said it going to games is more important than results for him.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Vish I never said going to the games was more important than winning anyone who would make that choice simply does not understand the game. That is not simply a choice that exists in the real world. You also said you wanted to go to anfield because of the history maybe but you are a middle aged man I am talking of long term 50 years plus which is the horizon when you plan such monumental events as a new stadium. And remember this the new stadium would be in Stanley park 50 yards from the existing stadium. You say you wanted to see the Kop well unless you went before 1990 you have not seen it, it was demolished the Kop we have now is rebuilt completely. I know because I have a brick from the Kop in my conservatory and a painting of the old Kop that made Liverpool famous on my bedroom wall.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8,791
I remember you saying you would rather have Liverpool in the championship if it meant the ticket prices were lower and more people could afford it. It's funny, because I honestly DO understand that point of view, you want the people who love Liverpool to be able to go to the games, which is fine, but it WOULD be detrimental to the club overall.


Sign Reus
Page 28 of 31 1 2 … 26 27 28 29 30 31

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion