KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 … 15 16
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
I don't think we need city type owners just for FSG to show a little more ambition the returb is £150m the new ground would be about £400m that's not a huge difference in the scale of these things. But FSG won't take the risk because they are looking at the short term only


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: theanfieldpigeon
NOT THIS [oops] AGAIN


Biggest issue facing LFC nothing else comes close


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
Originally Posted By: theanfieldpigeon
well petition it to fsg and lfc directly then, because your consistent protests on here is 1, very annoying and 2, redundant.


The part about being redundant is very true, we have no power to do anything about it so moaning about it isn't productive. Building work is only a matter of months away from starting, the wheels are rolling so we may as we'll just get on with life and see how things turn out. Stan could be right but he could also be wrong, only time will tell. There's way more important things to think about in life than stressing about such things.

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 22,394
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
I don't think we need city type owners just for FSG to show a little more ambition the returb is £150m the new ground would be about £400m that's not a huge difference in the scale of these things. But FSG won't take the risk because they are looking at the short term only


Where did you get £400m from? I'm sure I saw a figure close to £800m but cold be wrong. It's a huge amount of investment for me whether it's £150m for a refurb or £400m for a new stadium so in happy in that respect but I can see that a new stadium would be good.

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Originally Posted By: theanfieldpigeon
NOT THIS [oops] AGAIN
I think the argument it's relevant to every 'FSG are brill' thread that pops up Pidge.


That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
You have to admire Stanleys staying power though.


That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22,926
Originally Posted By: lumba
You have to admire Stanleys staying power though.


No, I cannot admire that, thinking that investing 150m is the end of the world and no new investment is possible is foolish. In 15 years nobody knows how things will look, the main thing is to spend what we can afford right now, not take undue risk and jeopardise the future of the club. SP can cry as much as he wants, I am convinced that FSG are doing things rightly. Yes it would be better to get some rich arabs as owners, but, nobody was interested, so I prefer reality than live in dreamland as fools.

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 23,084
If having no fight and settling for second best is what you want Vish,that's your call.


That job interview was going so well until I realized I was fukked up on acid in the middle of a cornfield naked and talking to a scarecrow.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
It seems pointless to spend £150m on anfield now only to build a new ground in 15 years as some are saying and I am pretty sure you would struggle to get planning at anfield once they have built new roads and whatever. An extra £250m may seem a lot to us but in modern football it's two transfer windows or 4 luis Suarez set that against the long term future of the club. John Henry is very rich in his own right but also a financier so pretty sure he could raise that without blinking but the sums don't add up not for the club but for him we are working to his wealth plans and vish and co seem focused on that but I thought we supported LFC not John Henry and Linda. Well apart from marko


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
S
1st Team Regular
1st Team Regular
S Offline
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,128
Originally Posted By: lumba
If having no fight and settling for second best is what you want Vish,that's your call.


Spot on Lumba, Stan gets dogs abuse on here because he wants the best for the future of the club.

People don't have to agree with him and that's their right, but I admire his convictions and much of what he says makes perfect sense.

Some of the abuse he receives is bang out of order.

Page 3 of 16 1 2 3 4 5 … 15 16

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion