This may be a ridiculous idea but does anyone think Agger is a viable option as an alternative to Stevie? Stevie is a better passer and obviously better in final third but other than that in terms of mobility,tackling and heading their either equal or agger edges Stevie. I think agger is a better alternative to Lucas although he would need matches to adapt. An especially good option if we're up 1/2-0 and we want to grind out the result. He would surely offer more than lucas and we are looking thin In backup for stevie. Thoughts?
"History doesn't matter"-Chelsea Fans "Aim for the sky you will reach the ceiling, aim for the ceiling you won't leave the floor."-Shankly
This may be a ridiculous idea but does anyone think Agger is a viable option as an alternative to Stevie? Stevie is a better passer and obviously better in final third but other than that in terms of mobility,tackling and heading their either equal or agger edges Stevie. I think agger is a better alternative to Lucas although he would need matches to adapt. An especially good option if we're up 1/2-0 and we want to grind out the result. He would surely offer more than lucas and we are looking thin In backup for stevie. Thoughts?
No, his mobility is not good enough for a midfield.
Agger is good when he is on form but the last couple of seasons he has been a weak link. He is also similar to Reina in disrupting the dressing room. I hope he stays that would give us 4 quality CBs not counting Coates and Illori. But I wouldn't be fussed if he leaves it might just give Illori a chance and touch wood Coates looked much better than Agger in the Roma game.
noun [oops]·trar·i·an \kən-ˈtrer-ē-ən, kän-\. If all else fails say that word outstanding a couple of times. The more you do the more you will believe your own spin.
