|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913 |
It's all like a friggin' nightmare this. EVERY LFC fan I've spoken to over the past 2 days has said exactly the same. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
|
|
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628 |
Any other employer would sack an employee that badly misbehaved outside the workplace, bringing the companies name into disrepute, not once, twice, but 3 times now. Not if they are worth £100 million they wouldn't
IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913 |
Any other employer would sack an employee that badly misbehaved outside the workplace, bringing the companies name into disrepute, not once, twice, but 3 times now. Not if they are worth £100 million they wouldn't That's why I said 'any other'...loosely speaking.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205 |
The guy is a mess.
It makes no sense though that he is banned from Liverpool matches for something he did while playing for Uruguay.
I know my belief counts for nothing, but I would be very surprised if the ban stands as far as LFC is concerned. It'll get overturned. Do LFC actually have ANY say or right to appeal to FIFA on this? I doubt we do, but this punishment is a little over the top Do you remember this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKt4IBxD5oo&feature=kpAnd how long was he banned for? 10 games total 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 103
Under 16 Player
|
|
Under 16 Player
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 103 |
Didn't Suarez play for Uruguay when he was banned for the Ivanovic bite. I know the FA can't ban him for internationals but that just seems like an added kick in the balls.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,270
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,270 |
They don't need to discipline him as he won't be playing for us come September 1st.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,813
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,813 |
Way too harsh. Someone should nibble his shoulder causing small indentations that fade away 5 minutes later. That way, the punishment WOULD fit the crime perfectly.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,813
Under 23 Player
|
|
Under 23 Player
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,813 |
KopProphet, don't take everything you read in The Guardian as a certainty. It's a lack of discipline, not a mental issue. B0ll0cks - people don't bite because of a lack of discipline. This is a reflex he can't control - deep-rooted in his psyche probably due to his upbringing. The man needs psychiatric help not endless condemnation and moral posturing. Football is full of ugliness - and that was an ugly game he was involved in. What FIfA have done is unprecedented and disproportionate. Ring 'em up and tell them then. I'm sure they'll listen...and ignore. His responsibility to behave outside LFC's control is HIS responsibility, not the Uraquay FA or anyone else's. He'll appeal and the ban will be reduced. He has shown on several occasions that in a pressure situation when things aren't going his way, he loses control. In legal terms, that is defined as diminished responsibility. Whilst there should be some kind of punishment, it should only effect him personally, ie a large fine and some type of community service. No one can say it was a planned act of lunacy. He has a problem and should be helped with some kind of counselling or therapy to begin with immediate effect.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
|
|
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446 |
If he can prove that he has some sort of diagnosable mental health problem I'm sure the punishment will have to be reduced. Let's face it he does have something wrong with him and I would be very surprised if it's never been diagnosed.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913
1st Team Regular
|
|
1st Team Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 18,913 |
If he can prove that he has some sort of diagnosable mental health problem I'm sure the punishment will have to be reduced. Let's face it he does have something wrong with him and I would be very surprised if it's never been diagnosed. Wasn't this the case at the end of the 202/3 season too though?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
