You are more likely to get more naming rights on an impressive new stadium than a tarted up Anfield. Also Anfield is being done over many years not one hit which pretty much scuppers naming rights and the phasing over many years is another cheap option by FSG.
Yes the club was in a mess in the latter years of FSG but I cannot see how that justifies relegating Liverpool to a second tier club.
Liverpool are still one of the worlds great clubs why Vish do you want to limit the clubs ambitions. As the poster above says neber mind our manchester rivals Everton could be ahead of us one day they are exploring sites for a new stadium
In the later years of FSG???
If we have been able to stay one of the world's great clubs despite not winning the league for more than 2 decades and a 45k seater, then imagine what we can be with a 58k seater and success on the field. With a new stadium success on the field will be very difficult (check Arsenal with their naming rights stadium if it is difficult for you to understand) and I am sure we won't be that great in 20 years, but you won't understand.