Your argument about this is completely subjective and has no basis in facts whatsoever. I have told you my opinion on it which you seem to dismiss because you view it a different way.
My argument is not that Liverpool don't need a top stadium. My argument is I would be very happy with a revamped anfield as that is the most realistic project as I see it.
Burdening the club with debt for a new stadium which in an immediate sense offers no extra revenue but far more cost does not seem very viable to me. Your belief that ticket prices will fall in the future only makes the revamped anfield option a far better proposition in my opinion
Most debate is subjective unless you want to bombard each other with statistics. Having a revamped anfield forever limited to 58k when our main rival already has 75k is £150m wasted to me money completely thrown down the drain we might as well set fire to it. A build over the long term would be easily affordable but FSG don't want to extend themselves and seem to be gearing up for a swift exit in a year or two leaving the club forever in the wake of our rivals. A tragedy
