KopTalk.com Forums Football Liverpool FC Forum What have FSG brought to the table ?

Not until now

Well the joke is on young Liverpool fans and generations coming up when our club will be forever behind our main rivals due to the wrong decisions made today

Anyone under 35 the joke is on you

I'm not worried

Yep, I'm feeling good about it.

LFC is already at a disadvantage right now and the Anfield development would allow us to catch up with most except Manure, but anyway even with a brand new stadium we are not supposed to catch up now. The 150m expenditure will be paid off in 10 years with the additional seating capacity. If we need to further develop we can do it afterwards even if it means a new stadium. May be in 10 years time match day revenue will be a very small proportion of overall revenue and there will be no need to develop further, nobody knows. Why invest in a future which is so uncertain, makes no sense to me.

I am not worried either I have seen the best years when this club was ambitious the 60/70/80,s now pragmatism and compromise rules the day and abetted by people who have grown accustomed to second or third rate Liverpool. I want the great days back and match or better our rivals which subjects me to ridicule by some online people on an LFC topic forum.

Funny old world we live in

What is the point vish in spending £150m with all the planning hassle and building an entirely new stadium in 10 years. It's also not just about money with the anfield regeneration this is a once in a lifetime opportunity to get it right for the long term.

But what you want can easily bring LFC on its knees by over spending and get in a downwards spiral.

Are you losing your marbles? You said FSG are preparing their exit strategy, contrary to them saying they are here for the long term. I purely assumed that you actually had some inside info and weren't spouting out rubbish about FSG purely because you have some sort of vendetta against them, because anyone can do that. However seeing as you are refusing to share this info, it seems i was mistaken.

Not suggesting we overspend vish but a 65k seater stadium new build is affordable over the long term for all the reasons previously stated. Also as I just said with the developments in Liverpool and the huge cash (£2b) flowing in this is a once in a lifetime opportunity.

The combined city board has only met once so far so there is a lo go at they are unlikely to hand out money directly but there are things that could be done guarantees and so on.

Future generations will curse us for messing this up and being too cautious. If the stadium can be paid back in ten years then we are not being ambitious enough it should be 30 to 40 years or longer.

And marko happy to debate as long as you can articulate something of meaning which to be fair vish can even though I disagree. Thank you