KopTalk

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 32 of 103 1 2 … 30 31 32 33 34 … 102 103
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
D
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
D Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
Unless 58k is plenty big enough.

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 7,446
Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
No it could happen but would be massive cost never mind rerouting roads rebuilding stands and moving them back and removing houses or other civic matters would be colossal not just in money but legal and planning. The fact we are discussing these possibilities before a spade is in the ground shows how flawed these plans are


We would face issues to expand but so does every other club, do you read that article that Marko posted about united and the railway lines?

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
Originally Posted By: sixtiesred
Originally Posted By: vish LFC
Originally Posted By: Hercules/AF 58
Originally Posted By: Maxi88
So you "likened" them to us. That's a comparisons plain and simple according to a dictionary. Back to school now

No Maxi, I didn’t link them to us, There is no linkage between us and them other than that we play in the PL, I said we could end up like them if we don’t invest, that’s not a linkage nor a comparison. The old saying: "There’s none so blind as those who do not want to see” comes to mind, and if you don’t want to see I can’t make you see or comprehend.


We have probably the 3rd or 4th highest net spend over the last 3 years, how can you compare us to Stoke?


you guys really she is not comparing she said we could end up like a stoke or Sunderland ie there situation nothing more ! laurel and hardy are blind but thought you would of read it better than that VIsh


shes a he for a start.

He also said we'll end up like Stoke or Sunderland which is a ridiculous point/comparison to make. We have the 3rd highest net spend since FSG took over. We are increasing revenue substantially year on year. That is the main point. Annefield realised he'd made a ridiculous point and tried to deflect it by turning it into a grammar police sideshow (didn't think you'd approve of that one)

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Manchester United was 60k in 1996 what Liverpool fan can be satisfied with after all these years only matching where our main rivals were 20 years ago? And that's the best we can ever do !

If you really are satisfied with that great. But I suspect it's more arguing your corner rather than any belief or rationale, if Manchester United permanently have that advantage then the likelihood is our league position will be aligned to that over the long term.

So that's it Liverpool football club have found their true position. No issue to me as I have great seats in the lower centenary but for the club this is a depressing position for us to be in.


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
M
Under 23 Player
Under 23 Player
M Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,307
in your opinion

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
D
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
D Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
I'm more concerned about having a better team on the pitch - you don't win a trophy for the biggest stadium.

60k is still a bloody big stadium Stan.
Add to that a regeneration of the area with bars, restaurants and shops and ample money will be generated. You keep ignoring the fact that our sponsorship revenue is through the roof also.

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
D
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
D Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
Just thought I'd repost this, just to show how ridiculous this thread really is.

Originally Posted By: Stanley Park
"Moores sold out because he did not have the funds to take the club forward albeit he was a very rich man. He also was a majority shareholder. Ok his commercial sense was not the greatest let's say.

But in terms of financial muscle I don't think we have achieved significantly more with either of the two American owners since moores in fact we seem to have slightly gone backwards.

Now of course you could say we now have greater marketing and commercial expertise and so we do. However that could also gave been achieved with the right management team around moores. It certainly would have been more agile decision making than we have seen since FSG took over.

Other than the odd sponsorship deal (which you could argue we could have got anyway) what have we really achieved ?

The ground redevelopment I am sure we could have done with moores and done it ten years earlier. Commercial development is a moot point.

My view is largely since moores sold our we have stood still for almost a decade and the final outcome after all that is largely underwhelming
"

E
Eliot
Unregistered
Eliot
Unregistered
E
I think this is going round in circles now.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Liverpool Legend
Liverpool Legend
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 27,628
Originally Posted By: Maxi88
in your opinion


Yes obviously


IF YOU WANT TO BE HEARD SPEAK SOFTLY - BOB PAISLEY
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
D
1st Team Squad
1st Team Squad
D Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,205
Originally Posted By: Eliot
I think this is going round in circles now.


Sadly.. it's been going in circles since the second page frown

Last edited by Duncan_Donut; 13/06/14 08:25 AM.
Page 32 of 103 1 2 … 30 31 32 33 34 … 102 103

Moderated by  KopTalk Team 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
Advertisements
Liverpool FC Discussion